Resolving color name conflicts when combining ID documents
Hi,
I use an ID template document (.indt) when building layouts for my individual magazine articles. In the colors pallet are colors named "Article primary accent" and "Article secondary accent" (as well as a plethora of custom stock colors that remain fixed). The primary and secondary accent colors make it easy to use other preset styles with these colors applied. E.G. then when I'm ready to set a color 'mood' for the document, all I need to do is change the color definition, and then all my titles, sub-headers, page numbers, table rows, box borders, etc. switch to the new color automatically. Makes sense?
We use a separate ID document for each article so that different editors can work on different parts of the magazine at different times.
Now I want to try using the Publish Online feature to create a HTML version of the whole magazine. That requires assembling all articles into a single ID document. This is a bit clunky with section start, page numbering, and LH vs RH page idiosyncrasies...but doable.
However, I'm running into color naming conflicts when combining documents to assemble the full magazine in ID. "Article primary accent" from later articles is getting reset to the color definition of the color used in the initial (first article) starting document. I am not getting a color name conflict warning dialog box like I get if copy/pasting and object from one layout to another. It seems like dragging pages from one document's Pages pallet into a second document (the right way to combine/add pages, right?) does not recognize that there are 2 colors with the same name.
Am I missing something? Is there a better way of doing this? Is there a non-tedious way of hard-coding color definitions so documents can be combined?
Thanks,
Ben

