• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
61

P: Still inconsistent capture date/time for photos and videos

LEGEND ,
Dec 09, 2014 Dec 09, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Update 5/17/2018: Though LR 7.1 made improvements, LR 7.3.1 still has two closely related problems with a single underlying cause:

- With photos and videos missing metadata capture date/times (e.g. scans), there is still an inconsistency between the times shown under the thumbnails in grid view and in the Metadata panel and the hidden, internal times used for sorting in grid view.

- Changing IPTC Date Created in the Metadata panel, either by editing the field or using Metadata > Copy/Paste Metadata, similarly causes inconsistent values to be shown and sorting and searching to work inconsistently.  It also causes date metadata to be written back to the files that doesn't conform with the Metadata Working Group's standard.

The underlying cause is architectural: LR doesn't have a single internal catalog field representing "capture time".  Rather, it maintains capture time in several different fields, and the various parts of LR update those fields inconsistently.

See here for precise recipes to replicate these bugs:

https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom-still-inconsistent-capture-date-tim...

https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom-still-inconsistent-capture-date-tim...

See here for a workaround: 

https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom-still-inconsistent-capture-date-tim....  

-------------

LR 5.7 still shows inconsistent capture date/times for videos. For a test .avi on Windows 8.1, the date in grid view appears to be the file system's last-modified time, while Capture Date/Time is set to the time of import.This problem was declared fixed in LR 5.5, and it appears to have been fixed for images, but not videos:http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/inconsistent_dates_for_files_missing_date_time...I'm opening a new topic, since the previous one has been marked "Solved". Untitled2_inline-402b28f5-7fce-4485-bbc7-1eba2e9ee1ed-622028544.pngUntitled2_inline-402b28f5-7fce-4485-bbc7-1eba2e9ee1ed-622028544.png Untitled_inline-a0d82271-2553-4a54-8824-20de68939af3-906850541.pngUntitled_inline-a0d82271-2553-4a54-8824-20de68939af3-906850541.png

Bug Investigating
TOPICS
macOS , Windows

Views

1.3K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Employee , Dec 13, 2017 Dec 13, 2017
Hi all,

Just to reiterate what Sunil said in a comment above, this issue should be fixed in Lightroom Classic CC 7.1. Please let us know if you're still seeing this issue after updating.

Thanks,
Melissa

Votes

Translate

Translate
replies 168 Replies 168
168 Comments
LEGEND ,
Dec 13, 2014 Dec 13, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yes, this is quite annoying for me. Because reverse capture date is my preferred sorting method in the grid, old videos I add are being shown before anything else, because LR5.7 is putting their capture date as the time of import.

Here's a much less neater example than above (scribbled on my Surface):

Image68_inline-3ba4f80b-7131-41b5-8405-0917002534c7-1126680535.png

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Dec 13, 2014 Dec 13, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I find the behavior has changed BUT is still wrong.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
Dec 14, 2014 Dec 14, 2014

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks for keeping this issue "Open".

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 13, 2015 Mar 13, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I imported >1000 videos from 2014, all got the "Creation date" set to "Import date" (for all my video-sources), although they could be split into the proper folders by date during the import, which means LR *CAN* properly interpret the dates, *BUT NOT* in the Library while sorting!

This is total disaster, because I am not able get the files in the correct creation order to rename and store them properly, which *CRUCIAL* to work with the video clips!

There is a *WORKAROUND*: you can make LR update the dates using the menu function "Metadata/Edit capture time".

... *BUT* - I am not going to do it manually for 1000 files. And after that *FOR EACH AND EVERY IMPORT*...

This seams to be a simple *BUG* and I do not understand why it has not been fixed for years now as it is a *FUNDAMENTAL FUNCTIONALITY*.

I would really appreciate to get a fix *SOON*. Or at least a better workaround. At the moment I'm *BLOCKED* in my workflow, and the material get produced more and more.

I can support the developers with further details and examples.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 13, 2015 Mar 13, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Fotografista wrote: "There is a workaround: you can make LR update the dates using the menu function 'Metadata/Edit capture time'. ... I am not going to do it manually for 1000 files."

I haven't tried it recently, but in the past you could select all the videos, do Metadata > Edit Capture Time, and then hit OK without making any changes to the date/time. This would set the capture time correctly for each of the selected photos. So you wouldn't need to do it one video at a time.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 16, 2015 Mar 16, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

John,

that would work. But *all* the files would get then the *same* date and time (of the "most marked" one). It's OK, if you wanted to move the time of all files about an interval, but that is not what I need.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 16, 2015 Mar 16, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I saw there hundreds of bug reports in here...

I would really appreciate to get an answer it was read from someone from LR Team. Just to know this thread in not an dead end...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 16, 2015 Mar 16, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Fotografista wrote, "But *all* the files would get then the *same* date and time (of the "most marked" one)."

I haven't tested with videos in the most recent version of LR, but in previous versions, I and others observed that Edit Capture Time would set the capture time of each video to its correct internal time, not the time of the most-selected video.

That in general is how Edit Capture Time works when you have multiple images selected. It offsets each image's time by the amount that the most-selected image is being offset. If the most-selected image is being offset by 0 seconds, than all the others will be too:

Untitled_inline-e47b1c2e-98e4-42da-9582-1abdb05c0453-983742575.png

The text of the Edit Capture Time window says "but not videos", but at least in past versions, it did what I described. Worth a test.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 16, 2015 Mar 16, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Update: I just updated my post to clarify a little.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 16, 2015 Mar 16, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I just verified with LR 5.7.1 / Windows 8.1: You can correct the inconsistency described in the original post above by:

1. Select all the videos.

2. Metadata > Edit Capture Time

3. OK

For each video, this will make the Capture Date/Time shown in Metadata panel match the capture date/time shown under the thumbnail in Library Grid view (which is the file's last modified time, if LR wasn't able to read the file's metadata).

There is no need to do each video one at a time. But if you have any doubt, make a backup of your catalog first.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 20, 2015 Mar 20, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

To John:

thank you very much for all your research, I'll give it a try, although it seems to be just another workaround and it MAY stop working for any reason...

I've just gone through my 1000 thousand videos and stated the problem is even worse - there are sources (android devices only?) where there is the original capture time wrong - it can be seen under windows as well (last modification time). It seems to be a creation time while copying the files on android or something like that. Now I am completely unsure if there is anywhere the proper capture time - as I said windows shows not the expected time and LR shows just nothing...

I will probably need to dig in the EXIFs of the videos... I hoped LR is clever enough to manage it on its own. I'm getting even more frustrating. I am ensuring myself one again - NEVER EVER TRUST any tools you didn't constructed yourself...

... my origin idea was so simple - throw everything into LR, let it sort by LR and make your own order. None of these works 100% (just try to import some BMPs from a scanner).

Grrrrr

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Mar 20, 2015 Mar 20, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LR does a poor job with video metadata in general. Add your vote and opinion to this topic:

http://feedback.photoshop.com/photosh...

You might consider my Any File plugin to manage your videos in LR. It uses the very robust Exiftool to extract video metadata and add it to the LR catalog, and any changes you make to the metadata in LR get written back to JPEG sidecars. Any File isn't as convenient as having proper video management built in to LR, but it gets the job done reliably.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
May 06, 2015 May 06, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I believe that Any File plugin is great, thanks John!

Does anyone know if this has gotten better in LR6?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Contributor ,
May 06, 2015 May 06, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I havn't tried it yet but there is nothing in the release notes that indicate that anything was done to improve metadata for video or image files.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Explorer ,
May 06, 2015 May 06, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The bug still exists in LR CC 2015.0.1 / Windows 8.1.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
May 30, 2015 May 30, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

This is absolutely maddening, especially as I'm trying to migrate from Aperture which can read all the date, camera, and location info on videos just fine (and has for years).

The data is all there, can be read by other competing apps along with utilities like exiftool. Why can't Lightroom do the same?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 17, 2015 Jun 17, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The bug still exists in LR CC 2015.1 released a couple of days ago. Given that this bug has been present in some form for 4 years now without a resolution is a deal-breaker for me in my quest to find an Aperture replacement.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jun 17, 2015 Jun 17, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Not sure why is rocket science for Adobe to acknowledge and fix such an obvious bug. The whole video support is just poorly made

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jul 03, 2015 Jul 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I'm having a similar problem. The dates are correct on my Samsung video camera and files, but when LR imports them, it says they were shot in 1949 (and bizarrely, a day before the actual day they were shot)! I can go into each folder and "Edit capture time" and select "Date file created" to fix the dates, but then I have to drag and drop each file into the correct date folder, because LR sorted them all (upon import) into folders with the wrong dates!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Aug 01, 2015 Aug 01, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied



The Meta Data of the files look correct, but the sorting is wrong (maybe some creation date problems)

I'm a Mac User on Mac OSX 10.10.4
(you forgot to add a specification on this form!)

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Aug 10, 2015 Aug 10, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

After months of waiting if not for a solution that at least for a reaction from Adobe I decided NOT TO USE LR for any video-oriented purposes, it seems the video features are pure marketing, sadly.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Aug 22, 2015 Aug 22, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

This bug also happens for photos when there is no DateTimeOriginal but there is an EXIF:ModifyDate, e.g. with a scan that's been edited by an app but doesn't have a capture date.

As an example, here are the relevant metadata date fields for a sample TIF:


$ exiftool -a -G sample.tif | grep -i date
[File] File Modification Date/Time : 2015:08:22 12:25:20-07:00
[File] File Access Date/Time : 2015:08:22 12:25:22-07:00
[File] File Inode Change Date/Time : 2015:08:22 12:25:20-07:00
[EXIF] Modify Date : 2015:08:21 21:02:27
[ICC_Profile] Profile Date Time : 1998:02:09 06:49:00


And here's a screen shot showing that the date under the thumbnail shows the operating system's file modified date, while the Metadata panel shows the capture time as the EXIF:ModifyDate:
Untitled_inline-ae05e7c9-7fc4-46f8-b2a8-806d064a9be6-936119776.png

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Oct 26, 2015 Oct 26, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I have this problem too. My photo was taken on my iphone using a different app and the photo didn't record an Exif capture time. However, it must detect it somehow as the capture time is correct in the metadata tab. The end result is that even though the capture time is correct, it doesn't sort by capture time correctly. The photos that reproduce this are here:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vmanuyx80y...

There, the middle photo doesn't sort correctly even though the metadata shown in the metadata tab looks correct.

My light room version is 5.7.1 build number 994254

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
LEGEND ,
Jan 04, 2016 Jan 04, 2016

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Another inconsistency (observed in LR CC 2015.3) for photos missing a capture date in their metadata: The metadata panel shows a capture date, but the Date column for the filter bar shows "Unknown".

Untitled_inline-7a495e76-849c-49cd-a499-c1af0cc46a68-1893639308.png

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Beginner ,
Jan 16, 2016 Jan 16, 2016

Copy link to clipboard

Copied



The rename functionality within Lightroom 5.7 ( “Menu>Library>Rename Photo”) is broken when renaming video files using filename templates that contain the “Date” tags. This is only an issue with rename as the problem doesn’t occur during the initial import of the video files into the catalog using the exact same template. The problem appears to only affect video files and not my RAW or JPEG files.

My filename template contains a “Custom Text” tag followed by the capture date. For example:
5diii.November 21, 2015-18.05.35.MOV

Rather than use the capture time the bug in the rename functionality pushes the file’s name 6 hours into the future. This is what led me to uncover the problem as a directory from 21st of the month contained files named as if they’d been shot on the 22nd...

As noted the initial import works just fine so as a test I removed one of the affected video file from my library, moved it to another part of the disk, and then re-import the file. Upon doing this the file’s name correctly reflected the capture time. (Note I had to move the file because the import dialog hides the rename option if the file is in the same path it’s going to be imported into – could be annoying for some).

See the included screen captures for details of what I've said here.

While the above workaround is a viable it’s a very painful one as my custom tag is based on my camera model. To preserve that I had to isolate all my video files by model and re-import each separately applying the correct custom tag to my template. Under Windows 10 this isn’t too big a deal using both search and copy, but it still took a good hour and was only made easier by the fact that, unlike my still images, all my video images are in a single catalog. That said the catalog spans 10 years and includes ~2500 files. In that time my wife and I have used 7 different cameras and 5 different smartphones which is what made it a pain.

I happen to in UTC-6, but changing my timezone on my PC doesn’t seem to affect the problem and even then I’d expect the value to be 6 hours in the past and not 6 hours in the future - unless an absolute value is being applied. That said I have no idea if LR is determining my time zone from my IP address and not looking at the system time but I’d be surprised if that were the case so this is probably just a coincidence.

Finally, I’ve only had to rename files in my video catalog if I forgot to set the “Custom Text” for the camera model. Not doing so defaults the custom text to ‘untitled’. It would be nice if LR threw an warning if this was the case as I doubt most people intend their file names to contain untitled. IF possible I could see this being an optional setting ("Warn custom tag not specified") stored on the template that is set to true by default, otherwise a global catalog setting would be nice.

On a related note once an instance of LR has been used to perform an import the custom text is retained until LR is restarted. While a nice feature, this has caused me to accidentally apply custom text for the wrong camera if I import from multiple sources in one session and forget to change the custom tag. A similar option warning would be nice (i.e. “Warn custom tag when changing source”)

The video in question as it appears in my catalog alongside file system details from Windows 10:
lightroomissuerename_inline-3c492ef2-10e8-4d3e-ad6e-90df2e920549-978579220.PNG

The video in question re-imported with the correct date along side the incorrectly named one. Note that I brought up the rename dialog on the correctly named file and the preview shows the name reflecting the 6 hour shift:
lightroomissuerename2_inline-51a34bb4-08cb-4be2-b135-e65ca7ad25a9-256208743.PNG

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report