Skip to main content
Inspiring
February 12, 2016
Question

Integrating Lightroom and Bridge

  • February 12, 2016
  • 8 replies
  • 41024 views

I think there would be great benefit to integrating Bridge and Lightroom.  Lightroom is fantastic and I use it extensively in my workflow to import directly from my camera memory card, rate images, tweak if necessary, and export to jpeg (my images are raw).  However, Lightroom is not so good at browsing images that are on a hard drive or network drive. If your hard drive has many raw images (or JPEG) you can nicely browse in Bridge and find the images you want.  However, you now have to open Lightroom and import the images.  Why not just have an open or import into Lightroom menu.  Yes I know you can open them in Photoshop using Camera Raw but for most of my images I prefer to use Lightroom when I don't have to make any "creative" edit with Photoshop.

It has been suggested to just leave all my images in Lightroom and then search for them there.  However I prefer to keep Lightroom clean (about 1 -2 years worth of images) and I also have many old images that were scanned and never came through Lightroom.

I think this would be a very useful tool and I would not think it would be that difficult to integrate.

Sparky

This topic has been closed for replies.

8 replies

DdeGannes
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 13, 2022

Just a thought from a user of Lightroom from Beta in 2006, initial release in 2007, through to Version 5 in 2014 to the transition to LrC, users of Bridge/ACR have displayed the most problems in a transition to Lightroom.


Trying to get Lightroom to function like Bridge/ Camera raw will only cause frustration. To wit they do not "talk" to each other, Lightroom communicates with the info in the Catalog file, as far as Lightroom is concerned that is where the info resides.

 

Bridge/Camera raw requires the info to be stored with the file, they cannot read from or write to the Lightroom Catalog. That is why you have use an option "automatically write metadata to xmp" or manually use the write / read from the file option to communicate.

 

Make a choice depending on your workflow requirements use one option or the other, either one will allow you to get where you need to be, trying to use both will only lead to frustration.

 

 

Regards, Denis: iMac 27” mid-2015, macOS 11.7.10 Big Sur; 2TB SSD, 24 GB Ram, GPU 2 GB; LrC 12.5,; Lr 6.5, PS 24.7,; ACR 15.5,; (also Laptop Win 11, ver 24H2, LrC 15.0.1, PS 27.0; ) Camera Oly OM-D E-M1.
Inspiring
February 23, 2022

It would seem you could get *some integration between the two, using startup scripts, if you could figure out the scripting for lightroom.  Since I've seen no devkit for it myself (though I know there is one since people script plugins for it all the time--though mostly for exports), I couldn't be certain how to actually code the darn thing.

The process (from what you are describing) would go like this:

Browse for image(s) in BRIDGE, select image(s), get file locations of selected image(s) [this would be a list for a looping section to work each file], put up a text box for naming the new collection Lightroom will use, check if Lightroom Desktop open (Open it if not), check if collection exists (create new if not), import file(s) to collection.

 

If anybody knows how to code this in a script, you could probably use it in bridge to send data to a holding collection in Lightroom where you can then handle the camera-raw develop processes directly.

Again, I do not code, but I have begun some study in that direction.

 

In the meanwhile, those who wish to work this way can do the following:

 

-----Put in a memory chip and partition the disk in sizes that match DVDs with one called Canon, then other called LIGHTROOM, and any excess space called CACHE.

-----Inside the CANON partition Create a folder named with a number (eg 100)

                This is important, as each numbered folder will represent something different in the camera, usually a lens change, so you can separate images this way as well, just remember to keep their folder structure when you import them

-------On the Lightroom partition create a folder called LIGHTROOM (this will make it easier to see in lightroom later.

Bridge can copy or move images to the CANON folder without losing anything, and you can separate them into numbered folders to differentiate them for processing

--------In Bridge, you should mark the files with keywords before you send them to the numbered folder on the CANON partition, usually something descriptive but short so it's easier to remember, no caps, and something easy to search; now just copy them over

--------Remember to have Lightroom save the xmp and metadata into the file, not into sidecar files

--------When you open lightroom, you can create a new catalog and save it to the LIGHTROOM folder on the disk

--------Import your files, do your work save the catalog

--------You can now copy your files back to their original location however you want; if they are in different folders, you will have to do them one at a time... ...total pain... ...Best to move things to a single folder then move them around later based on keywording in bridge.  Keywords are a very big timesaver.

 

Partitions sized at about 3gb are good for DVD (single layer), 7gb for double layer, 18-23gb for standard bluray, 48 for double layer, and 98-120 for tripple layer bdxl.

dj_paige
Legend
February 23, 2022

It would seem you could get *some integration between the two ...

 

Clearly, Adobe has no interest in doing so.

Participant
October 12, 2022

Why it makes sense to have a transitio from Bridge to LR as a selection in addition to Photoshop

I teach photography ranging from novices to advanced photographers.  LR has a notorious reputation for not being user friendly to beginners in regards to viewing and importing pics so much so that it detracts from them wanting to use it. Of course we know once they would import their images LR is very user friendly.

On the other hand, Bridge is as simple as it can get to quickly view and make decisions on what images to edit. That's great but then opening them up in Photoshop  is way beyond anything they are ready for. What they can deal with particulary since Bridge provides them with the means to sample the concept of working with camera raw editing is the much less daunting transition to LR Develop. To begin with these folks first need to see what LR editing is all about without first becoming embroiled in the LR cataloging system - reagardless of how useful it will prove to be down the line. I have tought a number of media production courses over the years and have come to understand that it's critical for new people to learn faster and more in depth to use incremental steps  rather than take giant leaps in concepts and applications. Bridge is a perfect first step but jumpimg right from it to P is too great. That is also good advice to Adobe - most  of the potential customer base is not existing pros who can only see using LR and PS to begin with. Bridge is the point of entry from which to grow a significantly larger new and number of users.

stanleya29544172
Participant
June 13, 2019

I think that Adobe has done a disservice by including Bridge as part of Creative Cloud without warning Lightroom Classic users to avoid using it to move or rename Lightroom images. What is sorely needed is an upgrade to the Library module in Lightroom Classic to include all the functionality of Bridge.

dj_paige
Legend
June 13, 2019

stanleya29544172  wrote

I think that Adobe has done a disservice by including Bridge as part of Creative Cloud without warning Lightroom Classic users to avoid using it to move or rename Lightroom images. What is sorely needed is an upgrade to the Library module in Lightroom Classic to include all the functionality of Bridge.

I don't agree with this, and personally, I would not want Adobe spending resources and time on making Lightroom have the same functionality of Bridge. I think there are plenty of other things I would prefer to see incorporated into LR.

Nevertheless, as indicated earlier in this thread, you need to file a formal feature request with Adobe.

Participant
August 2, 2018

Guys,

Is totally clear  what each  application serve for. For me, the most interesting thing is using a powerful search of Bridge, after finding the photo is know in what LightRoom catalogs the photo is.

JP Hess
Inspiring
August 2, 2018

But you can do the same type of search that you do in Bridge using Finder or File Explorer. Bridge IS basically a file browser whereas Lightroom only displays what has been imported into the catalog. Two completely different browsing concepts.

Rolfens
Participant
December 28, 2017

So if I understand well, you would be adding a step to your workflow, pre-lightroom. The aim being to keep your Lightroom catalog lean by only importing what you need.

So you just need a way to send files from Br to Lr. Drag and drop works, as pointed out elsewhere.

Br can also be extended through "Launchers" (and in other ways) so it might be possible to write a script to add the functionality you require.

Conrad_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 12, 2016

cpgilles wrote:

Why not just have an open or import into Lightroom menu.  Yes I know you can open them in Photoshop using Camera Raw but for most of my images I prefer to use Lightroom when I don't have to make any "creative" edit with Photoshop.

If I'm understanding correctly, you want a command in Bridge to send selected files to Lightroom? That's a reasonable request, it sounds somewhat like the existing File > Place command in Bridge that sends files directly into After Effects, InDesign, Photoshop ,and Illustrator, or the bottom of the Tools menu that can send files to specific features in Photoshop, Illustrator, etc.

Bridge may not have that right now, but there are still things you can do. I use Lightroom and Bridge together a lot, and what really helps is that both programs support drag-and-drop very well. If you're looking at some images in Bridge that you want to see in Lightroom, select and drag them from Bridge, and drop them on the Lightroom window or program icon. Any time you drop images on Lightroom it will pop up the Import dialog box. The Import dialog box defaults to Add, so if you just want to add them where they're stored, click Import. The short version of that is, drag from Bridge, drop on Lightroom, click the Import button in the dialog box that pops up.

cpgillesAuthor
Inspiring
February 12, 2016

SaturnV.  This workaround is a good short term solution.  I frequently drag and drop images from Explorer but hadn't though of doing it from Bridge.  I will start doing that.  It would still be easier to do it withing Bridge maybe rightclicking on an image but this is an acceptable workaround

JP Hess
Inspiring
February 12, 2016

I could very well be wrong, but I don't believe you have fully grasped the concept of Lightroom. Lightroom is not a simple file browser like you have in Bridge. With Lightroom, you select the images that you want to work on in Lightroom and then import them. They become part of your Lightroom catalog, and that catalog is what stores all of the adjustments you make using Lightroom. After you import images then Lightroom "remembers" where they are located on your computer. So, with Lightroom, you can control what images are part of your Lightroom catalog. The catalog is the central file in Lightroom.

cpgillesAuthor
Inspiring
February 12, 2016

I do understand the concept of Lightroom and catalogs.  I received another response that says this subject has been brought up by others many times.  I also posted a feature request.  I use Lightroom, Bridge and Photoshop and I believe it would be beneficial to import an image or images into Lightroom from Bridge

JP Hess
Inspiring
February 12, 2016

As I see it, importing from Bridge makes no sense. Bridge doesn't contain your images. Bridge is just showing the images in the folder where they have been downloaded to your computer. What benefit you see from importing from Bridge? If it was possible to import "from" Bridge, it would still require the import process. So what do you think you would be gaining?

dj_paige
Legend
February 12, 2016

The idea of having Lightroom act as a file browser has been brought up in this forum and other forums many times before, and so far Adobe hasn't done it, and I doubt they will. This runs against the entire underlying concept of Lightroom.

Nevertheless, you should file a formal feature suggestion, or add your voice to those that exist already.