Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Lightroom Classic version: 13.1 [ 202312111226-41a494e8 ]
License: Creative Cloud
Language setting: en
Operating system: Windows 11 - Business Edition
Version: 11.0.22631
Application architecture: x64
System architecture: x64
Logical processor count: 8
Processor speed: 3,0GHz
SqLite Version: 3.36.0
CPU Utilisation: 1,0%
Built-in memory: 16306,5 MB
Dedicated GPU memory used by Lightroom: 2893,9MB / 6052,0MB (47%)
Real memory available to Lightroom: 16306,5 MB
Real memory used by Lightroom: 3217,7 MB (19,7%)
Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 6890,3 MB
GDI objects count: 841
USER objects count: 3392
Process handles count: 1961
Memory cache size: 480,9MB
Internal Camera Raw version: 16.1 [ 1728 ]
Maximum thread count used by Camera Raw: 5
Camera Raw SIMD optimization: SSE2,AVX,AVX2
Camera Raw virtual memory: 848MB / 8153MB (10%)
Camera Raw real memory: 1003MB / 16306MB (6%)
System DPI setting: 96 DPI
Desktop composition enabled: Yes
Standard Preview Size: 2560 pixels
Displays: 1) 2560x1440
Input types: Multitouch: No, Integrated touch: No, Integrated pen: No, External touch: No, External pen: No, Keyboard: No
Graphics Processor Info:
DirectX: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (27.21.14.5671)
Built-in memory: 16306,5 MB
Meets Adobe reccomendation for low end (8 GB also supported, but poorly). Eventually this may be too low. If you have a desktop, consider increasing.
Graphics Processor Info:
DirectX: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (27.21.14.5671)
So v456.72, this is old, approaching 3-1/2 years old, current at NVIDIA is v551.23, consider updating, when you do, select Studio driver, and select custom install type as to force a clean install. This can effect develop module performance.
NVIDI
...So:
Only consideration on that would (for a Windows computer) to relocate the camera RAW CACHE to a drive not containing the Windows Paging file, typically on C (Camera RAW CACHE and Paging file could be competing in terms of read/wrights). This may present a small performance
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Built-in memory: 16306,5 MB
Meets Adobe reccomendation for low end (8 GB also supported, but poorly). Eventually this may be too low. If you have a desktop, consider increasing.
Graphics Processor Info:
DirectX: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (27.21.14.5671)
So v456.72, this is old, approaching 3-1/2 years old, current at NVIDIA is v551.23, consider updating, when you do, select Studio driver, and select custom install type as to force a clean install. This can effect develop module performance.
NVIDIA 1060, getting very old. may or may not support newer LrC features. Would expect AI Denoise to be very slow.
6GB VRAM, Ok, but if you get a new GPU look for at least 8GB, higher is better.
Summary, update that GPU driver.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Can you recommend
me a graphics card
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Part 2
LrC slow, slow doing what?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
it is late to open
Even when you work in develop, it takes 3-4 seconds to go to the next photo
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Lightroom Classic
Library Path: D:\lr catalog neos\lr catalog neos.lrcat
Settings Folder: C:\Users\ΚΑΡΑΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΗΣ\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Lightroom
the directory is on this disk nvme 1tb.
as are the photos. free space is from 1 tb 522G
C:\Users\ΚΑΡΑΚΩΝΣΤΑΝΤΗΣ\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Lightroom
- nvme 500GB free 228GB.
Camera RAW CACHE 30GB
.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
So:
Only consideration on that would (for a Windows computer) to relocate the camera RAW CACHE to a drive not containing the Windows Paging file, typically on C (Camera RAW CACHE and Paging file could be competing in terms of read/wrights). This may present a small performance improvement in Develop.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
thank you very much for the help me
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I can upvote that. I've just installed Capture One, and oh boy, how fast that thing works! Switching photos - instantenous. Sliding any slider - instant smooth visual update.
I've editing small RAW files - 22 mb.
Having very powerful Ryzen 5800X3D with GeForce 4070 Ti and 32 GB ram and NVME drive, Lightroom works more or less the same as on 5 years old machine. From what I see Lightroom Classic never speeds up, no matter what hardware update I made. It's even worse - after updating to Windows 11 LRC got much slower.
What is slow?
* Switching photos in Develop mode (takes 1 - 2 seconds to update the UI after selecting other photo, more when the photo has adjustments and masks. Try clicking few photos in sequence fast, UI will just go berserk for many seconds)
* adjusting any slider - picture update is sloppy, both on GPU and CPU (lately CPU only is much smoother than GPU)
* applying masks
I'm really surprised why LRC slider adjusting is not really 60 fps smooth - on such powerful machines as we have now, changing exposure of 22 mb photo should have no problem with updating even 144 fps. Yet, LRC just likes to be choppy.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Just wanted to chip in and let you know you're not alone, your experience sounds identical to mine.
The UI in lightroom has been a repainting slideshow hot mess since LR6.0 for me (Non CC). As you report, CaptureOne is lightning fast for everything, I switched a few years ago and keep checking in on LR to see if it's improved, and, sadly, it seems to be getting worse.
My issue is the UI feels like it's running at 4fps. It's so sluggish to move around the program. Actually making edits isn't that bad but the application itself is bogged down. I've rebuilt my PC 4-5 times over the last decade and every time it's the same. Currently a Ryzen 9 7950X with 64gb RAM & SSDs everywhere and it's still useless.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I've just noticed that Camera Raw filter, which is equivalent of all that Lightroom does (except masks), in Photoshop, is running blazing fast. Constant 144 fps (that's my refresh rate), there is absolutely no lag and no jitter and no random choppiness to any slider movement, and picture update is immediate, zero lag, just like it is supposed to run on nowadays hardware.
What's wrong with Lightroom?! It feels like Photoshop is written in C++ and Lightroom in JavaScript.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Same here, you are not alone: https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-bugs/bad-performance-with-sliders-after-latest-upda...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
So I am not the only one: https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-classic-bugs/bad-performance-with-sliders-after-latest-upda...