Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Posted by:
Update (Dec 2024): With the new release, it is no longer necessary to perform Generative Remove Operations prior to Cropping.
Update (August 2025) With the new release, the Generative Remove Engine has been updated.
See this video for details: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwpUX4b6igY
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The generative remove in the latest release of Lightroom is working well but the user interface
is all over the place. I get half a box showing me the optional results that tries to display before the replace is complete. There is then some screen redrawing on the right panel and focus seems to come and go.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Pinner Photographer: "the user interface is all over the place. I get half a box showing me the optional results that tries to display before the replace is complete. There is then some screen redrawing on the right panel and focus seems to come and go."
First troubleshooting steps:
1. Restart your computer.
2. Update your graphics driver by going directly to the manufacturer's web site:
https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/kb/troubleshoot-gpu.html#solution-4
3. Reset LR's preferences:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/articles-page/how-do-i-reset-lightrooms-preferences/
LR sometimes soils its preferences file, and resetting it can fix all sorts of wonky behavior. That article explains how to restore the old preferences if resetting doesn't help.
4. Do the LR menu command Help > System Info and copy/paste the entire contents here so we can see exactly which versions of hardware and software LR thinks you're running and important LR options that are set.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
A simple scenario in removing a black cable in front of the sky results in just replacing the black line by a white. Several update cycles could not fix the behaviour. This is very weak. If this was the first version with generative remove OK, but this is not the case anymore.
Lightroom 14.2.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]
LR does a good job of removing the wire from your screenshot:
Most likely you've applied Remove on top of a Sky mask. Do Settings > Update AI Settings to recompute the Sky mask. See this short article for Adobe's recommended order in which to apply editing operations:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You are right, after refreshing the mask it works perfectly fine, thank you very much.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Bonjour
je trouve que sur MaC avec le dernier IOS la supression avec IA fonctionne trés bien je devais suprimer un gros camion d'un paysage
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Generative Remove Failed: We're experiencing delays due to high demand. Please try again later. I tried agian multiple times. How can I get around this? I have alot of dust spots to remove from a large timelapse sequence.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Use the Clone or Heal mode for dust spots -- much faster, doesn't use Adobe severs. And just as good.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Content Aware (renamed as Remove) is also good for spots or hot pixels.
For small stuff it works.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
thanks, tried this. didn't remove all the spots chosen and wouldn't refresh.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks, not in this particular situation.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@coryp21354218: The three non-generative-AI modes usually do very well with small spots. It would be interesting to see an example where it's failing -- attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot).
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
i do it to remove a face and in the place it generates new faces.
why not put a tab , with the old options ? like cloning and stuff
lots of time those stuf doesnt work, creating lots more of work
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]
@valentinosh: "i do it to remove a face and in the place it generates new faces...lots of time those stuf doesnt work, creating lots more of work"
If you select a face but leave parts of the body unselected, even parts that are disconnected, Remove will generate a replacement that tries to match that body. Select all of the body along with the face.
See this short article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
"why not put a tab , with the old options ? like cloning and stuff"
The older Clone, Heal, and Content-Aware modes are still available:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]
Often, Remove doesn't match tones well in flat tonal areas, as in your example. Sometimes you can fix that by selecting a larger area:
(You can get rid of the newly added wall outlet with a second application of Remove.)
Other techniques for ameliorating a tone mismatch: make the selection more raggedy; use short strokes with the Heal tool around the boundary to get better feathering; use the Brush mask and set Texture, Clarity, and Sharpness low to blur the area.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Remove AI does not work. No apply buttom. Instead of removing the imge is being replaced.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
"Instead of removing the imge is being replaced."
See this short article for how to remove objects more reliably:
https://www.lightroomqueen.com/generative-remove-replace/
Most complaints about Remove are addressed in the article. But if it doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot). With nearly every one of the many dozen problem photos posted here, we've been able to show how to quickly remove the desired objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, I am trying to understand why my generative remove attempts are sometimes very blurry compared to the rest of the photo, even with small patches. It was the case in all my session yesterday. For some reason, today, simply regenerating the same spots gives better results (but still blurry). I have the feeling Photoshop does better here, at least, is more consistent.
My photos are not high resolution (only 12MP DNG from a Pixel 6a)...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
[This post contains formatting and embedded images that don't appear in email. View the post in your Web browser.]
@CedricSimon: "I am trying to understand why my generative remove attempts are sometimes very blurry compared to the rest of the photo, even with small patches. It was the case in all my session yesterday. For some reason, today, simply regenerating the same spots gives better results (but still blurry)."
Generative AI Remove often doesn't match the surrounding noise/grain with replacement patches. Sometimes running Denoise first significantly improves the match. If that doesn't help, please attach a full-resolution JPEG exported from the unmodified original photo (not a screenshot) and attach a screenshot showing what you've selected for Remove. That will let us see more precisely what the issue might be.
"I have the feeling Photoshop does better here, at least, is more consistent."
PS and LR use the same Adobe Firefly Generative AI Remove, though their user interfaces are different, and they have different other remove modes (e.g. Heal, Clone, and Content-Aware in LR). So when comparing Generative Remove in the two apps, in LR make sure you've got Remove mode selected with Use Generative AI selected:
and in PS make sure Mode: Generative AI On is selected:
If you encounter an example where Generative Remove behaves differently in the two apps, it would be good to post an example here (with unmodified, full-resolution JPEGs). To date, no one has posted an example where the two apps differ.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Well, I am realizing that in PS I was not using the "remove tool" from Camera Raw, but the "generative fill" floating windows, and I simply enter nothing, so basically it removes my selection.
So in the end, in PS I was not doing the modification on the DNG file, but on a "flatten/exported" version of it, after Camera Raw has done its work. This could explain the small differences I noticed!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Did you use a sky mask? If so, you must update that mask. Another thought: This kind of removal might work better with the normal remove tool, rather than generative remove tool.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I did not use any masking.
The regular remove tool gives me trippy results because the tree is on the border of the frame.
Isn't this a setting/color space thing? This is a 3984x5976 DNG file
Thanks Johan!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Disable any cropping and disable lens corrections, then try the regular remove tool again. I have seen these color problems with generative remove in a gradient too. I don't think it's a color space thing, but just a limitation of the technology.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now