Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This thread is now closed. Please update to LrC 14.x or LrD 8.x. If you wish to provide feedback, please go to the new article.
The recommended order for applying edits is:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
WTF?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
works good for alot of things however just trying to remove a recycle bin and all it removes is the writing on the bin, tried twice
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You need to select/mask the entire item to be removed. This includes any shadows, refelections or projections. If you checked both Generative AI and Object Aware boxes, then also try with only Generative AI checked.
Can you post a screenshot of the image before and after using Generative Remove?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Améliore et facilite le travail parfois. Un renfort notable
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I removed a pole with a sign in a rather difficult landscape and it worked perfect. Great job!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Funciona muy bien, igual de bien que en photoshop. Es una cosa que veia necesaria en lightroom desde que empecé a usarla en photoshop. La única pega es que tarda muchisimo mas tiempo en procesarlo que en photoshop. Estaría bien que pudiese procesarlo en segundo plano mientras se hacen otras cosas en otras fotografias.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
funktioniert nicht!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
das generative Füllen in Lightroom habe ich getestet. Auf die Ergebnisse hab ich gar nicht erst gewartet. Habe nur eine ca 5 mm x 15 mm großen Bereich markiert (Baukran). Ich bin eine Etage tiefer gegangen und habe mir Kaffee geholt. Als ich wieder vor dem Rechner saß, war Lightroom immer noch nicht fertig Nein, macht ihr euch keine freunde.
Schneller geht ist, wenn man mit Rechtsklick das bild in Photoshop öffnet, dort bearbeit und zu LR wieder speichert. Solange die Schnelligkeit fehlt meine Empfhelung: auf diese funktion verzichten!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
90% of the time I use this, I want to just remove the object and replace it with a better understanding of the background that the remove tool. But this tool seems to constantly want to replace the object with a random other object that I have no say in. Very strange.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello,
Works very well to suppress a bin in the background.
But trying to suppress :
- a person in the background : the IA replaces by another person
- a person's head in the foreground : the IA replaces by another head.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That's my 2 cents about Lightroom Classi "removing" (do not remove anything) function....I'm trying to remove a bag of chips from an image...but it just generated other things...see images attached
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, in my cast the tool doesn´t work, when the green bar it stays on and doesn´t finish. In Photshop Beta it works alright.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Rikk and Ian,
I appreciate your repeated advice about being sure to select "shadows, reflections or projections" in order for Generative AI to cleanly remove an object rather than replacing it with some other (typically random) object.
However, you're probably getting an accurate sense from numerous other messages here that for anything but the most basic removal tasks, the average Lightroom Classic user is not going to do this intuitively, and even if they do my experience so far has been that it's a roll of the dice as to whether G-AI actually removes the object or attempts to replace it.
I'd also propose that if G-AI is smart enough to detect shadows or other artifacts and to take that finding as a signal that it should go about the intensive process of generating a synthetic object to replace the one being removed, it should also be smart enough to instead expand the selection to include the artifact and to remove it along with the selected object.
I suggest (again) that the choice of whether to "remove" the object (replacing it with a plausible, synthetic background) or to "replace" the object with an AI-generated surrogate for the removed object should be an option available to the Lightroom Classic user.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Removing sensor spots used to be really easy, now it's become impossible to do it decently. Why does everything have to be AI when things worked really great before? Is this some marketing stuff to sell your product?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@kayl46517980 It is not recommended to use Gen Remove for simple spots - especially sensor dust. The previous tools are still there and far more efficient for simple corrections.
Please see: https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-cc/using/generative-remove-faq.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In the most cases the AI-Removal works flawles for me, in one case it changes a Powergridpole with a different type of Powergridpole.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It did not work so well for me. I tried to remove an individual from a photo with 3 persons. I highlighted the person to be removed and the new Generative Remove AI tool simply replaced the person to be removed with another person, origin unknown. I have attached a before and after photo.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@richardb60793086 I had no trouble with your image. Are you selecting a wide enough area to get all extraneous parts? Shadows? Reflections?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you Rikk, I tried it again. Per your suggestion I included a little more than the subject in my selection, and it worked perfectly! It removed the person and perfectly filled in where the person was, even keeping the pattern of the curtain consistent. This is pretty astonishing feature.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Always remember, if you leave behind a shadow, a reflection or a leg under a table, the AI will try to make sense of it by inserting something to create the shadow, reflection or the leg....
A little wider is always a little better, too, as it blends the scene better.
Perfect? No - better than all the previous tools? Yes!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This will be a great tool for removing objects, but the few times I have used it so far I notice that sometimes it just tries to replace the object with a similar object and it is not removing the object. For example, I had a rope in a picture and when I selected the rope to remove it just replaced it with another AI drawn rope.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
One thing that has always frustrated me about any form of removal in LrC is how it performs along the images of edges. This poor performance continues with Generative AI. If I have an image of sand—just featureless relatively uniform sand—and in the corner is a small shadow cast by the photographer, I can completely select the shadow with borders around the small shadow, Generative AI will generate a different shadow. Maybe the newly generated shadow has a different shape or is smaller, but LrC can't seem to figure out that I want that tiny corner to look like the rest of the image. Ps never has this problem. This applies to rock or other distractions on the edge of the image that I try to clean up. Ps removes the distraction while, more often than not, LrC just generates a different version of the distraction. (macOS & LrC latest versions)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Seems to me the tool is misnamed--it doesn't remove something selected so much as it replaces that something. There is perhaps a need for Adobe to decide which of these functions is the primary one. The "generative" part suggests replacement more than removal, but many of us seem to be looking mostly for removal, since that's what the tool is called. Perhaps there could eventually be a way for the user to choose between replace and remove?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What an absolute perfect tool that s been added into Lightroom.
I have always used the removal tool with my Samsung phone because it never worked for me with the Adobe applications but this new feature in Lightroom........It's Just.......... Brilliant! Keep up the great work and can't wait for the final result.