Skip to main content
Rikk Flohr_Photography
Community Manager
September 24, 2025
Question

(Early Access) Assisted Culling (Lightroom Ecosystem - Desktop)

  • September 24, 2025
  • 69 replies
  • 7182 views

Introducing Assisted Culling (Early Access) in Lightroom Desktop 

For providing feedback for Lightroom Classic, click here.

 

We’re excited to share an early look at Assisted Culling, an AI-powered workflow that helps photographers quickly review large photo sets and select the best shots with confidence. 

 

What is Assisted Culling? 
Assisted Culling is one of the most requested features from advanced photographers, consistently topping feedback at customer events. It streamlines the process of identifying top photo selects from large sets—hundreds or even thousands—based on attributes like eye openness, sharpness, and more. 

 

Assisted Culling saves photographers countless hours of manual review, letting them focus on creativity instead of sorting. 

  • Eyes Open – Detects whether subjects’ eyes are open. 
  • Eye Focus – Measures the sharpness of the eyes. 
  • Subject Focus – Evaluates overall clarity. 
  • Clean Up – Identifies likely rejects (e.g., blurs, misfires, exposure issues). 
  • Stacks – Groups images either by visual similarity or time for easier selection. 

 

Why Early Access? 
Assisted Culling launches as Early Access at MAX 2025 with a narrow, high-confidence scope prioritizing portraits and headshots. This focused approach ensures reliability for these scenarios while we gather feedback and iterate. From here, we’ll expand to broader use cases like weddings and events before GA. 

 

How to Try It: 

  • Open Lightroom Desktop. 
  • Find Assisted Culling in the left photo panel. 
  • Select your criteria, adjust the settings, and apply batch actions, such as flagging selects or deleting rejects. 

 

FAQs 

  • Q: Where is Assisted Culling available? 
    A: Lightroom Desktop and Lightroom Classic as part of the MAX 2025 release. 
  • Q: How fast is it? 
    A: Our testing shows an average of 0.18 seconds per photo on modern devices (≈2000 photos in 8 minutes). 
  • Q: What kinds of photos work best today? 
    A: Individual portraits and headshots. 
  • Q: Do I need to pay extra? 
    A: No. Assisted Culling is included in your existing Lightroom subscription. 

 

Giving Feedback: 

Please share your experience in this thread. Include: 

  • App version/platform 
  • System details 
  • Example images (optional) 

 
Your feedback helps us refine our models and user experience. 

 

Lisa Ngo / Kwamina Arthur – Product Managers, Lightroom 

 

Posted by:

69 replies

Participant
April 18, 2026

New Lightroom update, but still can’t remove the culling feature from the sidebar. I don’t need it. I don’t want it. Stop cluttering up my UI.

Participant
April 10, 2026

OK - I’m late to this. I heard about Assisted Culling a few months ago, but only had the opportunity to test it on a personal project photo session at a racetrack yesterday.

In the day, I took around 3.8k RAW photos of mainly auto racing tracking shots, but also some stationery vehicle photos. As is always the case, due to intentional slow shutter speeds (typically 1/60th to 1/100th) for maximum drama, there’s a high failure rate where the cars are not in focus.

I used Assisted Culling in Lightroom v9.2 (I don’t use Classic) on macOS. All images are locally stored, not synced to the cloud. On an M1 Ultra Mac Studio with 64GB, it took around 20 mins, which is fine. The photos are 8192 x 5464px, taken with a Canon R5.

Assisted Culling “approved” of around 450 photos where the focus target was set to a maximum of 90%. It was generally successful, with only a few blurred images slipping through.

Here’s an example of a photo (unedited) which was successfully selected:

Percentage-wise, the motion blurred background is much greater than the sharp subject. All good.

But then I checked the rejected images manually. Thankfully. I found that around 1,171 photos were all good (and I was being fussy), such as:

Worryingly, the photos which didn’t exhibit motion blur, but had a shallow depth of field were also rejected by Assisted Culling, such as:

Unfortunately, it’s not currently something I can rely on.

Are there any avenues for improvement? I don’t mind if it takes a little longer or requires the user to perhaps confirm approved selection from a sample it deems need questioning.

Participant
April 9, 2026

I would love the ability to set the point to look for focus accuracy. I am trying to get certain shots and it is detecting lack of focus on the wrong point

baqir4
Participant
April 5, 2026

It would be great if the model could understand different photos/frames and sort them into categories. For example, I do photos of aircraft and would love it if it could sort the interior from the exterior.

Participant
April 4, 2026

Hi!

Would like to have eye (or head) focus selection also on animals. Being a nature photography the current culling is not very useful.

Train the AI more on animal and landscape photos.

ADRIANO_SILVA
Participant
April 3, 2026
The idea is excellent, but I believe that what's more important in the selection process is removing duplicate photos, photos that are similar. That would help much more than checking whether or not it was taken properly. That's my opinion.
TimoHotti
Participant
April 1, 2026

Does. Not. Work. For example, this one is a reject because it is blurry. 

 

vonOstoya
Participant
March 31, 2026

Hi, how can I switch off AI? It’s a crap, destroying my work. thanks

Participant
April 9, 2026

the only option for this function is ai

cwoz
Participant
March 16, 2026

would love to use it but all it does is crash my computer. wasted hours trying to get it to work

Participating Frequently
March 15, 2026

Amazing concept. I wish it had worked, but my results were very poor. I tried both culling and stacking and both were poor. It selected misfires and missed terrific shots. It picked many shots with eyes closed after selecting eyes open.