P: Generated images violate user guidelines

I have discovered that anything in the tonal range of skin is deemed inappropriate. I tried to remove a tattoo from a person of colour, hair across the face of a caucasian girl and extend the skirt of a peach coloured tulle skirt (in the colour range of skin tone) and all were refused. I think the puritans running the system need to consider that skin appears in any image with a human it it and skin in itself is not bad!

Additionally, I do a lot of fashion, boudoir, and art nudes... Why do I have to adhere to the lowest common denominator when it comes to using the tools I pay for in an entirely legal manner to support my business?   

I can totally get behind making it more difficult for anything that involves body swapping, or significantly modifying bodies.  Or taking a dressed subject and swapping them into nudity or near enough...

But if you're starting with a subject that's already in lingerie, it seems we've already gone past the "community standards" and shouldn't have to fight with Adobe to let us work.

Seems to me like they need a hell of a lot of bug fixing to to do. Most of my generations are pretty crap with the subject NOT keeping within the selection

While I understand that Adobe dosn't want Generative Fill to be used to generate adult oriented content for obvious reasons, it is not quite clear to me if it's permitted to be used on on photographs containing nudity. Specifically for object removal in the background.

I'm getting the same error with a photo of my mom looking into a vanity mirror (wedding photos) - there's nothing offensive about it. Happy to provide photo for investigation just don't want to post it publically.

Thanks Kevin! If only forums could have multiple pinned comments or worked like reddit with upvotes you might not have to repeat yourself so much! Worked fer

The concern for me at least is that it doesn't look like a bug as much as it suggests that "community standards" censorship is a feature.

I said it befor, I'll say it again. It's not the user violating the guidelines...it's the bot refusing to accept its own results. If the error message were to read something along the lines of, "the bot has generated results that are in violation of user guidelines and cannot be displayed," I think we'd have fewer instances of complaints over here. While I've received numerous violation notices, generative fill to date has saved a least a dozen of my images that would have taken hours to fix, if I bothered to fix them at all. Be patient, people. 

"The reason why these tools tend to fail on hands and feet is because these AI companies tend to steer clear of human anatomy (inherently 'evil'). Meanwhile if you learn real art this is the foundation where you start. "

You wouldn't know it from the number of images of amply chested women I see often on AI platforms. No, the real reason is that AI has difficulties with hands and feet for the same reason that real artists often find them difficult to draw or paint. They are very complex parts of our anatomy. At this time, Midjourney usually (I emphasise usually) does a very good job with hands and fingers. With feet, not so much. 

Hi @VeneficusFerox as mentioned in here extensively, try entering a prompt to bypass the false error.