Skip to main content
Participant
May 23, 2023

P: Generated images violate user guidelines

 

So as you can see, it's a PG-13 relatively inoffensive image of a woman in a bunny outfit. The top worked fine, and I was able to complete the top ear, which is cool. When I tried to extend the bottom with generative fill, though, I got this warning. They're just a pair of legs wearing stockings, and I wanted to extend it.

It feels like a false flag - though I could be wrong? I find myself thinking it would do the same for women in swimsuits.

Figured I'd share here.

1084 replies

Sef McCullough
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 3, 2023

The user-reported solution for entering a period (.) in the generate dialog is not workgin for me fyi. Still can't get around the vilation error. I haven't been noticing any kind of gender bias though, just that if I'm trying to generate (well, remove actually - GF is my go-to magical weapon for scene cleanup/declutter) anything that is close to the color of human skin it throws the error.

Gen Fill was working so beautifully just a short time ago! I rest assured it'll be back to full operation soon, we need to all give respect to our fantastic Photoshop team, they are very responsive. And they move like *cats*!

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
August 2, 2023

I was trying Stable diffusion just now and some of the human figures generated there were just as hideous as what we're getting on here

Participating Frequently
August 2, 2023

PS 25.0.0

MacOS 13.4.1

Gen Fill is stubbling over non-offensive objects

Participating Frequently
August 2, 2023

I should mention that the image in question was a blemish on a map. I am checking the map over for scan issues, scan lines, overly large spots, etc.

PixelDreamer
Inspiring
August 2, 2023

Yes. Sadly, we can say that Adobe's algorithm is not working as we all expected. There are times when even the simple act of replacing a missing hand or foot is impossible. It's really very random and very bizarre and, frankly, very annoying. On top of that, 90% of the time the faces, arms, hands, and legs are completely out of proportion or completely twisted. It's like a nightmare vision or like modeling clay. It's very weird and kind of disturbing. Hahaha!

Participating Frequently
August 1, 2023

Lol, yeah it scares me sometimes when a randed unexpected humanoid (we shall call them that for the time being) appears in my generation. 

 

What is good is you can copy and paste elements into pictures and then generate the edges to make them look seamless. That actually works well when you use the period trick. 

Graham24508943nobd
Known Participant
August 1, 2023

I've been saying the same thing since the last update, it's been dreadful and MUCH MUCH worse. Loads of colourbleeding, poor removals and hideous generations

Participating Frequently
August 1, 2023

@daniellei4510  Understatement! Meanwhile Midjourney can do this, to the point of challenging the uncanny valley.

Participating Frequently
August 1, 2023

Generative Expand has been reading too much Lovecraft.   I think it's far worse than it was a few days ago.   All I wanted to do was fill out a bench in a restaurant and it keeps adding nightmares. 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 1, 2023

Despite what a few YouTubers may have cherry picked to show off Generative AI features, it's a ways off from creating people adequately, at least when it comes to photorealism. 

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participating Frequently
August 1, 2023

And now trying to expand a scene makes creepy monsters.  This would be funny if it wasn't wasting my time.   Can I get on a bulletin list that tells me when GF will stop butchering humans and doing weird things?