• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
14

Adobe falling behind in AI Editing? [FaceApp]

New Here ,
Dec 30, 2023 Dec 30, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hey everyone,

 

I'm a long-time Adobe user and I've been thinking:  Why is there still no quick AI-based photo editing tool similar to FaceApp in PhotoShop? FaceApp has been a game-changer for quick, user-friendly aging, de-aging, digital makeup, etc. It's been around for over 6 years, setting new standards. So, I'm curious – why hasn't Adobe introduced something similar or better? 

 

I expect Adobe to be at the forefront of AI advances but it looks like they are falling behind. The Neural filters are rather disappointing and useless in comparison to the ease of use and consistency of FaceApp. Why not build on the GAN-based technology that allows FaceApp to do quick and seamless AI editing and improve it by offering automated batch-editing, improved side-angles, higher resolution, and add filters for editing more than just the face? 

 

This is crucial for me (and I guess many others) to decide if we should stick with Adobe. Looking forward to any insights or updates on Adobe's plans in embracing AI technology for creative work. BTW the customer service here is terrible. The chat bot is really dumb, and there is no email, phone number or real person to talk to. 

 

Cheers, Lars

 

 

 

[Extraneous topics removed by moderator]

 

janee_0-1704296812855.png

 

 

 

TOPICS
macOS , Windows

Views

257

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

As for customer care:

Click the speechbubble-icon (bottom right) and type »agent« to get in contact with a human person. 

https://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html

 

As for Adobe’s plans regarding AI-feature implementation: 

»Those who know don’t say and those who say don’t know.« 

Adobe personnel is subject to NDAs (also members of exclusive pre-release testing) and »simlpe« users cannot really know what is going on at Adobe … 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

 

Why not build on the GAN-based technology that allows FaceApp to do quick and seamless AI editing and improve it ...</>

By @Lars128794r43

 

 

 

I am not a lawyer, but my guess is that it would be illegal for Adobe to build on another company's software. Most if not all software companies protect their intellectual property.

https://www.faceapp.com/en/terms/

 

 

Can you tell us how your question applies to all seven topics that you marked? We can untag them for you.

janee_0-1704031547536.png

 

Jane

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 03, 2024 Jan 03, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That the current implementation of Generative Fill in Photoshop leaves something to be desired with its 1024px x 1024px limit seems indesputable. 

But if there are plans to change that is unknowable for the general public until Adobe makes an announcement on the issue. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 03, 2024 Jan 03, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@c.pfaffenbichler new limits are 2000 x 2000 px. 1024 was when it was in pre-release/beta.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 03, 2024 Jan 03, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks, @kevin stohlmeyer ! 

I haven’t been following the info closely enough apparently! 

 

But … 2000px x 2000px still does not seem satisfactory to me as I work for print a lot. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 03, 2024 Jan 03, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Currently it is limited to prevent surges in resources from the AI - you can use Gen Fill in sections for larger images, but if you exceed the 2000 px limit it still runs but the quality drops - much like resampling. You can imagine without a "speed limit" users would totally try to push the limits and crash the service.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines