Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Smart objects honor the physical print size, not the pixel size. This means you need to watch the ppi values for consistent size. The ppi numbers need to be the same.
This may seem counter-intuitive and against Photoshop's natural behavior - but it was intentionally designed this way for compatibility with PDF and vector data. This is just something you have to keep in mind when working with smart objects.
@li27112570w0z3 – Further to the reply from @D Fosse
PNG replacement image:
1018 x 1907 px @ 96 ppi (mismatch in PPI)
PSD smart object layer contents:
1019 x 1907px @ 300 ppi (target PPI)
PSD template image:
300 ppi (not important, I'm just noting this for consistency)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Smart objects honor the physical print size, not the pixel size. This means you need to watch the ppi values for consistent size. The ppi numbers need to be the same.
This may seem counter-intuitive and against Photoshop's natural behavior - but it was intentionally designed this way for compatibility with PDF and vector data. This is just something you have to keep in mind when working with smart objects.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@li27112570w0z3 – Further to the reply from @D Fosse
PNG replacement image:
1018 x 1907 px @ 96 ppi (mismatch in PPI)
PSD smart object layer contents:
1019 x 1907px @ 300 ppi (target PPI)
PSD template image:
300 ppi (not important, I'm just noting this for consistency)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you both very much for your responses. The replacement works properly now.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Is your conclusion that the PPI of the replacement image and the smart object layer content should be consistent?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Is your conclusion that the PPI of the replacement image and the smart object layer content should be consistent?
By @li27112570w0z3
Yes.