• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Best way to add a gradient masked layer but mask out subject

Explorer ,
Oct 13, 2024 Oct 13, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I am looking for the best non-destructive way to achieve the following. Any recommendations on how to setup my layers to meet the following?

 

My first idea is to create a new layer by merging everything that is visible (ctrl + alt + shift + E), then applying a layer mask and removing the subject's legs. It's not my preferred method since I don't have the ability to easily adjust the gradient later on.

 

I have a black color layer with a layer mask. The layer mask is a gradient black/white applied to it.
Why: I want to create a fade from the bottom (black) to the bottom 1/3 of the image (white), to keep the original floor of the image but fade into a blacked out background.

kdash1228_0-1728851486837.png

 

I want to mask out the subject's legs so the fade is not applied to the subject and appears to occur in the background/on the floor behind the subject.

kdash1228_1-1728851614066.png

 

Very rough example of the desired before & after:

Before (black background layer disabled)

kdash1228_2-1728851699020.png

 

After (black background layer enabled with subject's legs masked out) --

kdash1228_3-1728851743966.png

kdash1228_4-1728851925492.png

 

 

But, I want a way to mask out the subject without it affecting the original gradient that was applied. This way, if I make a mistake and mask out part of the background, I can use a white brush on the background so the original gradient is still applied.

 

If I use my original layer mask and mask out the background, I cannot apply the original gradient to the background.

TOPICS
Windows

Views

244

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Oct 13, 2024 Oct 13, 2024

I might or might not be understanding the problem fully, but when I want to do something like this, I look into applying multiple masks. Photoshop only allows one pixel mask and one vector mask per layer, so when you want to apply more than one mask of the same type, this requires workarounds.

 

One workaround is to use layer groups (folder icons), because a layer group can have a mask. Put the layer alone in a layer group, apply one mask to the image, and another mask to the layer group so that

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Oct 13, 2024 Oct 13, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Why not duplicate the layer and mask the legs on the duplicate.
Then create a new black/white gradient layer between the two layers in Multiply mode.

pixxxelschubser_0-1728858491432.png

The degree of darkening can then be regulated by controlling the gradient.

pixxxelschubser_0-1728859335947.png

pixxxelschubser_1-1728859384939.png

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 13, 2024 Oct 13, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I might or might not be understanding the problem fully, but when I want to do something like this, I look into applying multiple masks. Photoshop only allows one pixel mask and one vector mask per layer, so when you want to apply more than one mask of the same type, this requires workarounds.

 

One workaround is to use layer groups (folder icons), because a layer group can have a mask. Put the layer alone in a layer group, apply one mask to the image, and another mask to the layer group so that you can edit each mask independently.

 

In some cases, it can also work to apply another layer (such as a gradient fill layer) as a clipping mask, to a layer that has a mask.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Oct 13, 2024 Oct 13, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you! The workaround with the layer group worked perfectly.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 13, 2024 Oct 13, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That's the beauty of Photoshop: many paths lead to the same goal.
😉

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 13, 2024 Oct 13, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST
quote

That's the beauty of Photoshop: many paths lead to the same goal.
😉

By @pixxxelschubser

What's the old saying? "There are at least three ways to do anything in Photoshop. "

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines