• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
1

Gaussian blur pixelation

New Here ,
Aug 01, 2022 Aug 01, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi. I really want this effect to look nice and smooth and instead I'm getting waves and pixelation. Could anyone help?

TOPICS
macOS

Views

259

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Aug 01, 2022 Aug 01, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi if you are applying a gaussian blur then this effect will be shown trying to save this as a jpeg and check it shows or not otherwise it depends your resolution of file try on 300...regards

Ali Sajjad / Graphic Design Trainer / Freelancer / Adobe Certified Professional

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Aug 02, 2022 Aug 02, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

As you saw, blurring makes it look worse. A common way of dealing with this is to add a small amount of noise to the area with banding, just enough to obscure the banding, but not so much to make it look "noisy" (less than 1%). If the problem area were a Smart Object, you could make changes to the amount of noise, while keeping your original intact.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Aug 02, 2022 Aug 02, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Work in 16bit. 

Did you apply the Filters as Smart Filters? 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Aug 02, 2022 Aug 02, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

First off, this may not be in the data, it may be simply part of the display path. You first must always view this at 100% zoom or greater. Zooming OUT subsamples the preview and isn't an accurate way to view the data.

Even in 16-bit, if your display path isn't fully high bit (more than 8-bits per color), meaning the video card and display itself, you can still see banding. Again, this isn't in your data, it's a result of the bit depth of the video path.

So there may be an issue here or maybe, it's how you're viewing the data. We need more info to know.

Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management/pluralsight"

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Aug 02, 2022 Aug 02, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

As long as you work in 16 bit color depth, any banding you see is in your display system.

 

Even if the file is 16 bit, your display pipeline is 8 bit (unless you have an expensive 10-bit capable monitor). That's where the banding happens.

 

It's not in the underlying data. If it bothers you, a little noise will break it up, as Semaphoric describes.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines