Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I have been trying to find an easy way to make a selection out of a masked object but can't seem to figure it out.
I know if I hold Ctrl and click on the mask it will select it. But that selects the whole object including the hidden part. But what I want to do is to only select the masked part of the object. (i hope I am making sense)
Is there an easy way to do this without having the manually deselect part of the selection with possibly the magnetic lasso (which is what I have been doing)
Many thanks in advance for any help.
cheers
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'm not sure what you mean by the marked part. Can you show a screen shot?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, Chuck, I would guess it means the unmasked part?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
(duplicate)
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Typo, it should have said masked I am of course referring to the clipping mask
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Ok, indeed, there was a file attached (this option is annoying) I would first Ctrl+Click the top mask, then do an intersect bolean operation: CTRL+SHIFT +ALT click on the thumbnail of the mug. SHIFT CTRL adds, ALT CTRL removes.
( or a Right-click on the thumbnail and select Intersect transparency mask.
Instead of Marked, the term is a Clipping Mask in Photoshop
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hey, thanks for your reply. Yes, I was referring to the clipping mask, but had an auto-correct typo which should have read 'mask', not 'marked'...
And yes, you would have expected better attachment options from adobe... Anyway...
Unfortunately, your suggestion didn't work. Ctrl+Alt gets me close to what I need. The attachment Mask2.png is basically what I get from that. And from there I can simply delete the hidden area of the masked object. But then it still leaves a faint line (Mask3.png).
But essentially, I was hoping there would be a way I can simply slick to select as I have with Mask.png. But unfortunately, the only way I have figured out how to do it is by using the magnetic lasso - which is totally doable, but I want a much faster simpler method for when I need to do this technique on a large number of images.