Copy link to clipboard
Copied
After editing a few images in photoshop on my laptop, which look balance and bright, someone else can pull up the image on their computer and the image is dark. Is there a setting that I am missing?? I have adjusting the brightness on my computer thinking that maybe I am looking at a really bright screen, but even with that, they still look different on a different laptop. Suggestions???
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Did you calibrate your machine's display you edit image on?. Many run their machines with their displays too bright. When their edited images are displayed on well calibrated machines they are dark. I will admit I use my display to bright most users do. No one complains that my images are dark and they display on my 55" 4K TV beautifully. When I print my images I add an adjustment layer and boost brightness something like 20% and they print well.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This is why color management was invented. Icc profiles, monitor profiling, that's the only way to solve this problem. No shortcuts.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Taka a read of this - it may help expand on D Fosse's correct and succinct answer :
Colour Management simple explanation
Digital images are made up of numbers. In RGB mode, each pixel has a number representing Red, a number representing Green and a Number representing Blue. The problem comes in that different devices can be sent those same numbers but will show different colours. To see a demonstration of this, walk into your local T.V. shop and look at the different coloured pictures – all from the same material.
To ensure the output device is showing the correct colours then a colour management system needs to know two things.
1. What colours do the numbers in the document represent?
This is the job of the document profile which describes the exact colour to be shown when Red=255 and what colour of white is meant when Red=255, Green = 255 and Blue =255. It also describes how the intermediate values move from 0 through to 255 – known as the tone response curve (or sometimes “gamma”).
Examples of colour spaces are (Adobe RGB1998, sRGB IEC61966-2.1)
With the information from the document profile, the colour management system knows what colour is actually represented by the pixel values in the document.
So what can go wrong :
Colour management is simple to use provided the document profile is correct, always save or export with an embedded profile, and the monitor/printer profile is correct. All the math is done in the background.
One more to add to the above though - the monitor calibration still needs the intended brightness of white to be set when calibrating. For printing try and match the whiteness of your paper under the intended viewing conditions. For general screen use many, including me, find that setting around 100cd/m2 works well.
I hope that helps
Dave
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In general people do not calibrate their displays for the environment they use them in and they change the environment all the time. Carry their mobile devices with them use their laptops in different location and they prefer to have bright punchy display. So I edit my Images so the will look good on displays the way people use their displays. You should not do this if you intent to have your Image Printed. These days image are viewed more on displays then prints and framed wall hangings. User rely on manufacturer display setup and adjustment and profile provided by the manufactures and the brightness control their OS has. The only calibration I do is adjustment of my displays using software tools to help you adjust my displays. The are many web based tool on the web. I'm in the 10% Club of colorblind men. I see color very well and my color world is beautiful. Perhaps I'm better off I'm don't need to buy a calibrator and frequently adjust my displays. Time and money saved. Edit your image for how you will them Display/Print.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Your point that sending an image into the big wide world means that it will be viewed on a range of uncalibrated displays and in different viewing conditions is well made. But that is very similar to the problem faced by TV broadcasters. Like those broadcasters, the best we can do is adjust our images to look the way we want them to on well calibrated systems and send the images out, (in our case properly tagged with it's colour profile). That way, those with well calibrated color managed systems will see them as intended and others will see them differently - but at least with a similar difference to which they see all well adjusted images (whether that be bright /dim over/under-saturated or whatever).
The time taken to recalibrate monitors is negligible. This evening I have just recalibrated and profiled two monitors (the software reminds me to do this every 200 hours of use) each with 5 calibration set ups. It was all done less than half an hour while I answered some emails on my phone.
Dave
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I will not disagree. Do TV broadcaster stream video to display best on your calibrated computed displays or for LG OLED or Samsung QLED or Sony HDTV. I'm quite sure Film produces try to products the finest color film they can with current technology. Still its an art form where lighting is control and camera angle and scene composition is well throughout and planed. Makeup and costume take a army crew. Is TV color reality or Artfully done. People want to be entertained and see good image quality. I would also think sound quality would be higher on their list then Perfect Color reproduction. A good looking image will do.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Colorists for broadcast adjust their pictures on carefully calibrated, eye-wateringly expensive, grade 1 reference monitors set up to REC709 for non HDR and with 100 nit brightness and in dimmed viewing conditions (Neil in the Premiere Pro forums is the one to talk to for more info on this). The images are adjusted aesthetically for the content and to meet the technical broadcast standards.
Dave
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Calibrate your screen,
to achieve that with good accuracy I use a printed reference image - that way I know that white point and luminance targets are correct.
Have you ever wondered how to KNOW whether your screen [or printer] is ACCURATE and not just 'pleasing'?
If so please check this out: http://www.colourmanagement.net/products/icc-profile-verification-kit
Save images with sRGB embedded. If working in another colourspace convert then save with sRGB embedded.
That’s the best you can do if sending images to people with e.g: uncalibrated systems, handheld devices, applications that do not use colour management
I hope this helps
neil barstow, colourmanagement net :: adobe forum volunteer:: co-author: 'getting colour right'
google me "neil barstow colourmanagement" for lots of free articles on colour management
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@NB, colourmanagement net another reply to a thread from 2020