• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Problem stamping with adjustment layers.

Enthusiast ,
Jan 03, 2019 Jan 03, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Greetings, Everyone, and Happy New Year!

I'm encountering a problem stamping layers that include adjustment layers.  The problem only occurs occasionally and is illustrated in this example:

StampedAdjLayers.JPG

In the first case, I took a base image, applied two adjustment layers, selected all layers, then stamped the three layers (Ctrl+Alt+E).  If I were to make that fourth layer visible, it would accurately show the bottom layer with the adjustments applied.

In the second case, I repeated exactly the same process.  The result of stamping the base layer and the adjustment layers is shown in that last image.  The contrast is much lower because the adjustments are not being applied. 

Can anyone explain to me why the affect of the adjustment layers is applied in the first instance but not in the second?  (Note that Shift+Crtl+Alt+E produces the same result.  The blending mode on all layers is normal.)

Views

1.1K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Jan 03, 2019 Jan 03, 2019

View at 100%!

Noisy/grainy images, halftone screens, line art - anything that has tonality defined by sharp, pixel-level transitions - must be viewed at 100% for a correct adjustment preview.

The previews are calculated based on on-screen zoom ratio for performance reasons. Zoomed out, softened and blurred pixel edges introduce intermediate values that aren't really there in the original. So they "disappear" when you commit the adjustment to the full image data.

In a normal photograph this effect

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Adobe
Advocate ,
Jan 03, 2019 Jan 03, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

One thing to try, Don't select all of your layers when you go to stamp. Just select the top layer you want in the stamp. So in the case of what you are showing there, Just select the top Brightness/Contrast layer. If it is still giving you a bit of grief, there is another option I can think of. Instead of clipping the adjustment layer(s) to the image layer you want to effect, Grab the adjustments and the image layer and group them together in a folder. Then select that folder and stamp from there.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Jan 03, 2019 Jan 03, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Daniel, thanks very much for your response.

I don't really follow your suggestion: Just select the top layer you want in the stamp. Selecting one layer and using Ctrl+Alt+E produces no result.  My understanding is that the objective in stamping is to select a group of layers and produce a merged copy of those layers while leaving the individual layers intact.  So, multiple layers must be selected, no?

I did try the second suggestion.  NG.

I have experienced this problem when the layers selected included more than one blend mode.  But, here, all blend modes are normal.

The exasperating part is that most of the time it works fine.  Again, thanks.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jan 03, 2019 Jan 03, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Stamp is Shift+Ctrl+Alt+E, looks like you are missing a key there. Unless you modified it. If not, Try it with the extra key.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Jan 03, 2019 Jan 03, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I noted in the post: (Note that Shift+Crtl+Alt+E produces the same result.)

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jan 03, 2019 Jan 03, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

No clue. I just tried it, literally 100 times. (I actually counted...) and the stamped image was exactly the same as the layers combined. Not a single shift in anything. So not sure where these shifts are coming from for you. Sorry.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 03, 2019 Jan 03, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

View at 100%!

Noisy/grainy images, halftone screens, line art - anything that has tonality defined by sharp, pixel-level transitions - must be viewed at 100% for a correct adjustment preview.

The previews are calculated based on on-screen zoom ratio for performance reasons. Zoomed out, softened and blurred pixel edges introduce intermediate values that aren't really there in the original. So they "disappear" when you commit the adjustment to the full image data.

In a normal photograph this effect is negligible and not an issue. But in special cases, such as your second example, or e.g. a starry night sky, it makes a difference.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Jan 04, 2019 Jan 04, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

D Fosse, Yes!  Thank you.

The pic was shot indoors just to create a test image.  ISO was 12,800, so, very grainy.  Once the stamped image is viewed at 100%, it shows the effects of the adjustment layers.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 04, 2020 Feb 04, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you for this answer--I think resolves my problem. I am using pretty large files (around 12000 x 15000px) with many layers, and when I use STAMP VISIBLE the stamp layer does not match the original layers in brightness when I'm zoomed out enough to see the whole image. When I zoom WAY in the brightness of the stamp matches that of the original layers. The files have limited colors (like just 2-5 colors, dithered to create shading). 

 

So I guess I just need to trust that as long as the image looks correct when I'm zoomed way in, it's ok, even if it looks wrong when zoomed way out.

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jul 29, 2024 Jul 29, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

I'm having a somewhat similar problem but the answer doesn't work. 

I have a file with multiple layers (including smart, adjustment and regular layers). I want to create a new top layer so I hit [CTRL+ALT+SHIFT+E] and it creates a new layer on top of all the others. However, the image is slightly different from what was on the screen prior to the merge. The same thing happens if I flatten the image. I’m using PS 25.9.1 for Windows. I’m doing the merge from the very top layer (an adjustment layer). Never happened before. I printed the picture twice - once after I created the stamped layer & then after deleting the stamped layer. The pictures matched the

problem I was seeing on the monitor whereas they should have been identical. A copy of layers panel is attached.

 

 

 

 2c9d71b8196bb9fee5fb90a0a352032791bfe436.png

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines