versione stabile di Photoshop 26.0 l'estensione AVX2

[graceful_Swirl98A2]

Ho provato ad installare la versione stable di photoshop 26.0 ma non funziona nel mio Computer Windows poiche viene richiesta l'estensione AVX2 cosa che io non ho. Quindi mi chiedo e chiedo possibile che per poter utilizzare completamente il software dobbiamo sostituire i nostri PC? Credo che questa cosa rigurdi molti utenti della Adobe. Cosa si può sapere in merito?

[jane-e]

@graceful_Swirl98A2 

I've moved your post from Using the Community to the Photoshop forum for you.

Jane

[graceful_Swirl98A2]

Ti ringrazio, puoi darmi, cortesemente, il link per raggiungere il forum?

[jane-e]

@graceful_Swirl98A2 

All Community forums:

https://community.adobe.com/

Photoshop forum:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/photoshop-ecosystem/ct-p/ct-photoshop

Your post:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/photoshop-ecosystem-discussions/aumentar-y-disminuir-tama%C3%B1o-y-du...

Jane

[Ged_Traynor · Accepted solution]

@graceful_Swirl98A2 Photoshop version 26.0 requires a CPU with AVX2 support, you can continue using the previous version available from the Creative Cloud app.

Pre-2013 CPU's do not have AVX2

[graceful_Swirl98A2]

Si questo lo ho compreso, però si paga un abbonamento non potendo usufruire
degli aggiornamenti se non sostituendo il computer!!!!

[Ged_Traynor]

@graceful_Swirl98A2 that's something you need to take up with Adobe, you really can't expect pre-2013 PC's to run all modern software, hardware requirements change all the time as software is being developed/progressed

[jane-e]

@graceful_Swirl98A2 

You can continue using a version that works until you can upgrade your computer and OS. Until then, be sure to turn off automatic updates for applications in the CC app.

In the past 35 years, I've had to replace my computer multiple times because it would no longer work with new software, but I cannot imagine  using a Compaq 286 and Mac SE/30 with today's applications.

Jane

[Pascal_Peloquin]

HI Dexter; i really agree with you. I have an old HP Z60 with 2x XEON E5-2667V2, 48 Gb RAM , and an RTX2070 with perform very well with 3D conception soft or video editing soft ... than i think PS26 or LRc14 run on my PC .

Best rgards

[Pascal_Peloquin]

i would say HP Z620 😉

[graceful_Swirl98A2]

Ancora una volta per utilizzare la versione più recente di photoshop occorre il processore con l'estenzione AVX2. Posibile che la Adobe ci obblighi a sostituire i nostri computer per utilizzare  completamente il programma?

[Pascal_Peloquin]

j'ai bien peur que oui !!!

[Jon5FE2]

I use PS CC, PSBeta CC Bridge & Camera RAW and yesterday I was told to update.  Camera RAW will, but when I tried to do the others I got a notice telling me my Processor was incompatible.  I have the update request notice blocking part of my workspace which I cant remove, and I cant now upgrade the software.  Is adobe telling me I have to spend 1000's on a new PC for me to be able to use the software in future?

Any ideas of what I can do

The issue is AVX2 apparently, screenshots attached 

[kglad]

to remove the popup, reset the cc desktop app by making sure it's in the foreground, then press:

Win: Ctrl + Alt + R
Mac: Cmd + Opt + R

to see the needed specs, https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/system-requirements.html

[Jon5FE2]

That worked on PS, but not PS Beta where it just brings up performance overlay, ahh well.  My CPU has worked fine with PS until this update, has the AVX2 requirement been added in this update? Its just this issue that is stopping the update. all else specwise is fine 

[kglad]

again, to see the needed specs, https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/system-requirements.html

[Jon5FE2]

Yes I'm aware of the specs, which means I'd need to spend a huge amount of money on a new PC if I wanted to continue with PS CC - What I mentioned above though relates to the update message that appears in my work spce causing a further issue.  Ctrl+alt+R doesnt remove it 

[kglad]

if you want to remove the update notifications you can do that in your cc preferences.

[graceful_Swirl98A2]

Concordo

[DexterGordon2]

This is one of the threads I participated in that stated there's no technical evidence that AVX2 is required for photo editors, and no other professional editor outside of Adobe requires it. The motive, then, is commercial and quite immoral, seeking to force—I repeat, without technical justification—subscribers to buy new computers despite having computers fully capable of running professional software that's much more demanding than a photo editor. This is accelerated and forced obsolescence.
Since other posts that discussed this situation in more detail seem to have magically vanished, a quick search reveals a video of the procedure. Be careful, everyone should do so if they're curious, but they do so at their own responsability. I won't respond to the detractors with unprovable technical arguments because they "accused" me of not respecting the community rules, without engaging in a direct debate, face to face, that is, acting behind my back, they deleted my account and all my previous posts. Such misconduct never occurred (nor could it be proven when I appealed several times), but these days, debating is considered "offensive."
Watch it for general information only. If you want.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP64h9JF9MU
Cheers

[graceful_Swirl98A2]

Io ritengo che Adobe dovrebbe rivedere questa sua imposizione e consentire
gli aggiornamenti anche a quei computer che non hanno CPU con AVX2. Tutti
noi utenti dovremmo esprimere adeguate proteste, stiamo pagando un
abbonamento senza poter usufruire completamente dei software. Questo
disagio è più per chi utilizza il software in modo amatoriale, chi è
professionista certamente non ha problemi nell'aver sostituito il proprio
PC.

[DexterGordon2]

@graceful_Swirl98A2 
Naturalmente sono d'accordo al 100%. Adobe dovrebbe rispondere alle critiche senza agire autoritariamente censurandole. Sono un libero professionista, quindi pago direttamente la mia attrezzatura, ma il punto è che usare AVX2 come editor fotografico (o programma di progettazione) non è tecnicamente giustificato. Quindi non credo che nessuno voglia spendere soldi per qualcosa che rappresenta un'imposizione commerciale che avvantaggia coloro che producono computer, hardware e sistemi operativi e non una necessità tecnica. Quindi ci sono due cose molto negative: l'imposizione e l'azione autoritaria.
Saluti
D.G.

[graceful_Swirl98A2]

Dovremmo individuare quali azioni intraprendere verso Adobe affinché sani
questa ingiusta situazione

[DexterGordon2]

@graceful_Swirl98A2 
Finché la maggioranza si comporterà come un gregge, sarà difficile trovare una soluzione. La cosa ragionevole da fare sarebbe esercitare pressione segnalando queste pratiche non etiche sui social media.

[graceful_Swirl98A2]

Sono pienamente d'accordo.....potremmo creare un gruppo su Facebook dove
esprimere il disappunto per il comportamento della Adobe