dianap31691216 wrote My current catalog is organized by date (when importing From Camera I have used the option Create Subfolders Shot Date) which worked nicely when importing From Camera. |
Yes, this is my default way of organizing folders.
Problems have cropped up when bringing pictures in from different types of phones or when pictures with many “actual dates” were scanned in and the scan date was used as the shot date. |
That is true, there are many situations like scans when the date is not the 'date_taken'. It's always a problem to store files in date based folders even if it's not so much problematic to correct the estimated 'date_taken' in the catalog and even in the file metadata header for searching in the catalogs. Suggestion: create a master folder to store such scanned pictures. That will make moving files to the right subfolders easier.
. In addition, my catalog is huge and, as a result is very slow. |
What size in GB and number of items? A huge catalog would hold much more than one hundred thousand pictures. The catalog should not be slow except for a few operations like back up or optimization. It's an error to think that splitting the catalog (which is always a big problem) will help. If your catalog is slow, there may be another reason, for instance if you use face recognition. A faster hard drive is good, but the main factor is the available amount of RAM. The default 4 GB is really a minumum.
I believe, from your answer, that there is not currently a way to accomplish this, since only a complete catalog can be moved rather than selected portions of it regardless of the file structure within the catalog. Am I correct? |
You are right. But I think that moving the whole catalog and photo files folder is the best starting step before optimizing the folder structure afterwards.