Highlighted

Rotate patterns in Photoshop

Adobe Employee ,
Jun 26, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

 

Using Rotatable Patterns in Photoshop

 

One of the cool new features found in the June 2020 release of Photoshop is rotatable patterns. This feature allows you to rotate patterns (non-destructively) to change the angle of the pattern. You can change the orientation of any pattern in Pattern Overlays, Pattern Strokes, and Pattern Fill Layers. For this tutorial, I will rotate a pattern fill layer.

             final rotate pattern.jpg



Create a pattern (or use an existing one)

  • Open the image you want to make a pattern from
  • If you prefer, you can choose a pattern from the Window>Pattern panel

    1 pattern.png

 

  • Select the Rectangular Marquee tool 

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 12.33.47 AM.png


  • Select an area to use as a pattern. (Ensure feather is set to 0 pixels)  
  • Choose Edit > Define Pattern

    3 define pattern.png



  • Type a name for the pattern  in the dialog box

    Screen Shot 2020-06-14 at 10.55.20 PM.png


  • Open the pattern window by navigating to Window>Pattern to see your new pattern

    5 file pattern.png

  • The new pattern now appears in the panel

    Screen Shot 2020-06-15 at 12.48.21 AM.png


    ❷ 
    Open a file
  • Open an existing file or create a new one
    Create, open, and import images

    6 shape to select.png


Select an area to fill

Fill the selection with a pattern

  • From the menu, select  Layer> New Fill Layer > Pattern

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.18.14 AM.png



  • Click OK

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.19.57 AM.png



  • Click on the pattern thumbnail for select from different pattern options

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.20.41 AM.png



  • Select the pattern you just created

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.21.02 AM.png


❺ Rotate the pattern

  • Adjust the angle of the pattern in the Pattern Fill dialog, 

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.22.39 AM.png

 

  •  If you want to adjust the angle later, just click on the pattern in the layers panel and change the angle

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 8.36.06 AM.png


Note: The pattern angle selector can be accessed from these locations in the user interface:

Layers
  • Layer menu or Layers panel > New Fill Layer > Pattern > Pattern Fill dialog
  • Layer menu or Layers panel > Layer Style > Pattern Overlay > Layer Style dialog
  • Layer menu or Layers panel > Layer Style > Stroke > Fill type > Pattern > Layer Style dialog
Shapes
  • Options bar or Properties panel > Fill as Pattern
  • Options bar or Properties panel > Stroke as Pattern
Frames
  • Properties panel > Stroke as Pattern

 

 

 

Related links:

Create patterns in Adobe Photoshop

Adjustment and fill layers

 

 

 

TOPICS
DI, Editorial, Feature, Featured, How to, Make It

Views

2.9K

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more

Rotate patterns in Photoshop

Adobe Employee ,
Jun 26, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

 

Using Rotatable Patterns in Photoshop

 

One of the cool new features found in the June 2020 release of Photoshop is rotatable patterns. This feature allows you to rotate patterns (non-destructively) to change the angle of the pattern. You can change the orientation of any pattern in Pattern Overlays, Pattern Strokes, and Pattern Fill Layers. For this tutorial, I will rotate a pattern fill layer.

             final rotate pattern.jpg



Create a pattern (or use an existing one)

  • Open the image you want to make a pattern from
  • If you prefer, you can choose a pattern from the Window>Pattern panel

    1 pattern.png

 

  • Select the Rectangular Marquee tool 

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 12.33.47 AM.png


  • Select an area to use as a pattern. (Ensure feather is set to 0 pixels)  
  • Choose Edit > Define Pattern

    3 define pattern.png



  • Type a name for the pattern  in the dialog box

    Screen Shot 2020-06-14 at 10.55.20 PM.png


  • Open the pattern window by navigating to Window>Pattern to see your new pattern

    5 file pattern.png

  • The new pattern now appears in the panel

    Screen Shot 2020-06-15 at 12.48.21 AM.png


    ❷ 
    Open a file
  • Open an existing file or create a new one
    Create, open, and import images

    6 shape to select.png


Select an area to fill

Fill the selection with a pattern

  • From the menu, select  Layer> New Fill Layer > Pattern

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.18.14 AM.png



  • Click OK

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.19.57 AM.png



  • Click on the pattern thumbnail for select from different pattern options

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.20.41 AM.png



  • Select the pattern you just created

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.21.02 AM.png


❺ Rotate the pattern

  • Adjust the angle of the pattern in the Pattern Fill dialog, 

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 2.22.39 AM.png

 

  •  If you want to adjust the angle later, just click on the pattern in the layers panel and change the angle

    Screen Shot 2020-06-26 at 8.36.06 AM.png


Note: The pattern angle selector can be accessed from these locations in the user interface:

Layers
  • Layer menu or Layers panel > New Fill Layer > Pattern > Pattern Fill dialog
  • Layer menu or Layers panel > Layer Style > Pattern Overlay > Layer Style dialog
  • Layer menu or Layers panel > Layer Style > Stroke > Fill type > Pattern > Layer Style dialog
Shapes
  • Options bar or Properties panel > Fill as Pattern
  • Options bar or Properties panel > Stroke as Pattern
Frames
  • Properties panel > Stroke as Pattern

 

 

 

Related links:

Create patterns in Adobe Photoshop

Adjustment and fill layers

 

 

 

TOPICS
DI, Editorial, Feature, Featured, How to, Make It

Views

2.9K

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Jun 26, 2020 2
LEGEND ,
Jun 26, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Too bad the feature uses such a bad resample method … compare a rotated Smart Object with the Pattern to the rotated Pattern in the screenshots: 

rotatablePatternComp2.pngrotatablePatternComp1.png

 

Edit: I appreciate that »bad« is an ambiguous term here but I think the undesirability of the result in the example should be evident. 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 26, 2020 2
LEGEND ,
Jun 26, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

And to make sure that the transparency in the Pattern was not the problem here a screenshot with a Pattern that has no transparent pixels (unrotated, rotated Pattern, rotated SO): 

rotatablePatternCompWithoutTransparencyScr.png

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 26, 2020 1
Adobe Community Professional ,
Jul 14, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It seems that the pattern tiles are not antialiased when rotated, so that of you have a pattern that is same colour on both edges it will tile better… having seen this the pattern example you have is the worst case scenario… yes it needs to be fixed. Hope it can be reproted in a good way. 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jul 14, 2020 0
LEGEND ,
Jun 26, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

And another thing: 

Why are the rotation angle vaues negative compared to rotating Layers?

The Smart Object is roated 12˚, the Pattern -12˚. 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 26, 2020 0
Most Valuable Participant ,
Jun 27, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

What users need more then cool new features is a more reliable Photoshop. There are too many reported and acknowledged bugs in Photoshop that Adobe does not seem to care to fix.  Bugs reported in CS2 version 9 of Photoshop are still in version 21.2 of  Photoshop.  With  every new version of Photoshop Adobe add new bugs and feature. Photoshop is a mind field Photoshop that is impacting their users work. User need a more reliable Photoshop.  Adobe need to fix bug not add new buggy features that really is not cool.   However, I'll would bet that Adobe  will continue to break features and not fix them in the future enlarge their mine field. 

JJMack

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 27, 2020 4
LEGEND ,
Jun 27, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

What I find particularly annoying is when Feature Requests are »implemented« but in an obviously unsatisfactory manner. 

 

Apart from the rotatable Patterns the additional Warp-grid-lines come to my mind – one can add them, sure, but the bezier handles of non-corner-points snap to 90˚ angles on editing. What good is that supposed to be? 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 27, 2020 0
Guide ,
Jun 27, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I agree. Instead of implementing a LONG TIME requested function like this one in a more usable way and taking this opportunity to rethink the incredibly archaic pattern controls GUI, the PS developers implement pattern rotation in the worst way possible. And with anti-aliasing issues, it seems.

 

Heck, even the defunct Fireworks offered a more interactive interface to deal with this.

 

For comparison PhotoLine implemented a very usable and intuitive pattern widget to control patterns.

This widget allows for quick scaling (proportional and non-proportional), rotation, skewing (both x and y axes), and repositioning.

 

pattern_gui_photoline.png

Why the Photoshop dev team seems content (even celebratory) touting a half-baked and poorly implemented feature is past me. Adobe seems to be stuck in the dark ages instead of checking out the competition that does a far better job with far less resources! Why not at least attempt to do better and be more forward-thinking?

 

It boggles the mind. It really does. I do hope the responses to this thread will wake them up a bit. Sigh.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 27, 2020 2
LEGEND ,
Jun 28, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

And in this case one could really get to wonder: What Patterns were actually used for testing the improved feature?

Only photographic imagery where the interpolation issues are less noticable? 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 28, 2020 1
Adobe Community Professional ,
Jun 28, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The pattern scaling control still allows for only integers in percentage, so there's fewer values  available for reduction, but, hey — you can enlarge your pattern to ONE THOUSAND PERCENT! Looks super good.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 28, 2020 1
Guide ,
Jun 30, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Only 1000%? Why not more? I don't understand these limitations.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 30, 2020 1
LEGEND ,
Jun 30, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Upsampling images by that much usually leads to pretty poor image quality. 

And as the interpolation method employed for Patterns seems to be on the »economic« side to begin with the results for even bigger scaling are likely to be sub-optimal. 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jun 30, 2020 1
New Here ,
Jul 16, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I absolutely agree with you. It is an obstacle for me too whenever I am working on my website.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Jul 16, 2020 1
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

you seem to be a pattern user. I am too. Do you know why a pattern will be applied at various scales when applied as a layer style? I need patterns to be applied at exactly 100% only. Sometimes, when applying patterns as a layer style/pattern overlay- even in the Photoshop 21, patterns are applied at a variety of scales. I cannot see the scale without clicking out of the window because the dialog box covers the %.

It is easy to fix, but would like to know how to avoid? Any ideas? I thrown this to the wider community, got only one bite, and that one told me he couldn't reproduce it - and lost interest.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 1
LEGEND ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

chet_60, do all the files have the exact same resolution as the image you used to create the Pattern? 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

interesting.

not always.....but I can test this out. (may sound sloppy.) May account for why this occurs "sometimes".

will reply after I test.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Patterns we make are usually very small, 2x2, ... 8 x 8 px. sometimes 16 x16 - not ever really very much larger.

we apply them to images that have been resized to a resolution that relates to the desired outcome- weaving on a digital loom. those resolutions range from 45 - 105 p/i .

Once the draft is defined as a pattern- I don't know how to tell what resolution it was when it was drafted.

For sure, at 100% it is crispy pixels.

the test I just did- the pattern came in at 104%. 

Not sure what this is a result of.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
LEGEND ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

What are the resolutions of the original Pattern File and the File you used the Pattern in? 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
LEGEND ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Also what was the resolution of the image in which you defined the Style? 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I tested and retested. creating patterns that matched the resolution of the image.

pattern @ 75 ppi and image at 75 ppi

Same results.

when I apply the layer style- the pattern comes in intially at 104%. in this case...other times at other scales like 64%, 97%......would like to know what causes this.

 

if I change that scale on the first pattern application, all other patterns I apply to the rest of the layers will come in correctly.

How to make the first one a default setting of 100% or...to create the perimeters so that it does.

again...easy to change but why the variations?

 

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
LEGEND ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Can you provide

• the Pattern File,

• the File you used to define the Style

• and the File in which you applied the Style with the peculiar result? 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Here is a screen shot of a pattern applied using the new pattern panel. Comes in at 100% with a layer mask.

Why dont i like this? preview is not helpful...and maybe I don't want a layer mask - maybe I'd like a style.

 

Screen Shot 2020-08-10 at 12.42.31 PM.png

Here is a screen shot of pattern applied as a layer style. Coming in at 104%.

yes I can change it.....what is causing this difference?

Screen Shot 2020-08-10 at 12.41.49 PM.png

 Afraid I do not know how to put patterns and files here...only images.

Although I am new here....I am not new to photoshop.

 

 This is an issue I have been trying to resolve for SEVERAL YEARS.

I have had many files behave this way so, also I have had many student files behave this way,

it is not limited to this file and this pattern.

if you can tell me how to share files......i'l do it. thanks for being curious enough to step into this.

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Most Valuable Participant ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You show two screen captures one has a Pattern Fill layer clipped to a layer some blend if gray and the other a layer style effect pattern overlay added to a layer.  Neither show the Image windows at 100% Zoom so we can see what you see for the two different images.

 

What do you want from us??? Adam Lambert to sing to you What do you want from me!

 

If the Bar is the two layer at 100% zoom the pattern is tool small for my old eyes. How was the  clipped layer removed or merged?

JJMack

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

not sure how to respond to this question: "what do you want from us???" extra ???? because????

I will assume you are trying to be funny and not patronizing.

 

Here are 2 new larger  screen shots.

Top one shows: a single layer of color with a layer style /pattern overlay.

The pattern overlay comes in at 104%. Why?

Screen Shot 2020-08-10 at 1.58.45 PM.png

This screen shot- below- shows the same file with a pattern applied via the new pattern panel.

I looked at the blending option to see the scale of the pattern. It comes in at 100%.

I do not use any of the blending options. The pattern should completely fill content in the layer at 100% with 100% opacity.

What I was hoping (repeating here....) was a reason WHY SOMETIMES the pattern overlay comes in at more or less than 100% and what workflow needs to be used to ensure that it does.

 

Screen Shot 2020-08-10 at 2.03.07 PM.png

 This clipping mask thing feels borrowed from Photoshop elements- this is how this same process used to have to be applied.  I will get used to it, but there are times I do not want it....that are not relevant to this thread.

 

I do not know how to attach files not images in this forum.

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Most Valuable Participant ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Your canvas is small and pattern have few pixels what do you expect to see? scaled do to 2/3 size.

JJMack

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Pug 3080_2234example.jpg

This image has an image resolution of 105 pixels per inch. The file size is 3080 x 2217 @ 105 resolution. It is designed for a digital loom and will weave to a size of 29" inches wide.

The original photograph was first reduced in colors and then deconstructed into 16 layers.

There are 16 layers with pattern overlays.  Pattern tiles are : 16 x16 pixels in this example.

Screen Shot 2020-08-10 at 3.16.28 PM.png

 This is a close up. It is a .bmp. (just in case uploading to this forum renders the image in a way that shows greys). there are none.....bmp.

It annoys me that a pattern overlay comes in a various scales....SOMETIMES. Why? What is the setting that creates that change?  It is easy to fix, but as you have noted these patterns are small- it can be easily overlooked - so it creates an additional step in the work flow to check a thing that I believe could be set from the start.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Adobe Community Professional ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The problem is Layer Styles retain the last used value, even if that is a different layer or document. Instead of Layer Styles, try adding a Pattern Fill layer, with the layer itself used as a clipping mask.

 

Pattern Fills default to 100%. Or, if you're willing to forgo editablity, Edit > Fill, with Pattern as Contents are only 100%.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Most Valuable Participant ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yes my eyes have a hard time with pattern that are 0.15" by 0.15" even a at low 105  DPI resolution my eyes will be 80 in December. Then you scale the down with Photoshop poor zooming to 0.10" x 0.10 my eyes are not up to that task.

JJMack

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

i can say with certainty that i never use any value other than 100% for layer styles.

This is one of the things I have checked.

pattern fill is destructive- a no go. cannot forego editability.

so far, instruction is to always check this occassionally random value at least for the first layer.

 

 

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I congratulate you!

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Adobe Community Professional ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

>pattern fill is destructive- a no go. cannot forego editability.

That's why I suggested clipping to the layer.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 10, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you.

the original post was trying to figure out WHY pattern overlays come in occassionally at different scales.

I do clip, I do edit- fill.  i do use layer styles and correct the random scale.

the search for an answer continues.

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 10, 2020 0
LEGEND ,
Aug 11, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I can easily reproduce the issue of the 104% scaled Pattern Overlay by defining the Style with a 100% Patttern at 72ppi and applying it at 75ppi. 

 

chet60, sorry about the private message, the thread seems active now, so either I made some mistake or there was a temporary snafu. 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 11, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 11, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I am new to this forum so I am not up to speed on how it works.

so ...thank you for your persistance.

Here is the workflow for building, defining patterns and assigning weaves in photshop.

1. New file :  Resolution (matching the loom) in this case 75ppi.

     build the pattern, define it.

2. New file: image - colors reduced- colors deconstructed into layers.

   Resolution: (matching the loom) in this case 75 ppi.

3. Apply layer style....and result should be 100% on first one?

 (I have seen that if you catch and correct the first pattern overlay - the rest will be correct like a "sticky" setting should.)

I see that you used 72ppi and 75 ppi..... 

I am often asked what resolution to use for the patterns.  They are very small. 2x2, 4x4, 8x8, up to 24 x 24 or so.  I usually respond that they should use the same resolution as the loom - to reduce errors - i.e. things they forget to check. The resolution is the baseline in this process. 1 pixel = 1 thread. So most of the time - these 2 values are the same. (sometimes I don't do it...but over time I have checked to see if this has an impact and I havent seen it. )

 

Do you see that you do?

 

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 11, 2020 0
LEGEND ,
Aug 11, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The issue appears to be that the resolttions for the file in which you define the Style and the one in which you apply it are not the same. 

 

In the screenshots you can see the resolution in the Status Bar (bottom left) and the same applied Style has the Pattern at 100% at 72ppi and 104% at 75ppi. 

Apparently the Patterns in Styles are applied according to length measurements (as in mm) and not in percent or plain pixels – so resolution matters. 

Screenshot 2020-08-11 at 17.28.31.pngScreenshot 2020-08-11 at 17.29.05.png

 

So just make sure that all the files have the exact same resolution

If the issue arises descpite this please provide the files (the one in which the Style is defined, the one in which it is applied and the asl-file) for testing. 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 11, 2020 0
Community Beginner ,
Aug 11, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I will follow this.

thank you.

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 11, 2020 1
Most Valuable Participant ,
Aug 11, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

On thing I noticed when I first started recording Actions  was there are special settings for scaling Layer styles when resizing images and that  you can also scale them  with menu Layer>Layer Style>Scale Effects... .    I also notice that when  I recorder actions that added Layers styles to layers  that there were two ways to record  adding a Layer styles to a layer.  One way you add layer style is by using the Style palette.  This Add a Layer style to a layer by layer style name.  That Other way is to use the Layer Style dialog and add the effects you want to add. What surprised me was the there was a difference in how the styles were applied.  I thought that  layer style effects setting use to create the named layer style were just recorded somewhere in Photoshop's Styles and they would just be applied like the action step that recorded the layer style dialog settings. That you just had two ways to record adding of a layer style to a layer.   I was wrong.  The document's resolution that Named layer style was create on is also recorded into Photoshop Styles. When you apply a named Layer style the current document resolution is compared to the recorded resolution in the named style the settings recorded may be scaled  based on this  compare.  Document resolution setting is Important.

JJMack

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
Reply
Loading...
Aug 11, 2020 1