Skip to main content
Inspiring
January 31, 2018
Question

Why would you ever want to upsample a photo?

  • January 31, 2018
  • 2 replies
  • 3434 views

Hello everyone,

Please excuse me for being naive but I can't seem to get a firm grasp on upsampling. Say you have a 5 x 10 photo at 200 PPI and you are sending it to an offset printer so you upsample it to 300 PPI. Is the printed photo really going to look better upsampled? Does it depend on the photo?

This topic has been closed for replies.

2 replies

Trevor.Dennis
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 1, 2018

You at least retain control of the process if you handle the upsample.  Yes it depends on the particular image, and there are numerous means to do the upsample.  To my mind, the recently introduced Preserve Details 2 is a clear improvement on the original version, and the best process to increase pixel size currently available.

adamh88Author
Inspiring
February 1, 2018

Hi Tevor.Dennis,

Thanks for the reply and thanks for mentioning Preserve Details 2. I had not previously tried this option out. I played around with it a bit and it did a good job of reducing some pixelation/noise--although it did remove some detail. I could see it being useful in certain situations.

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 31, 2018

adamh88  wrote

Say you have a 5 x 10 photo at 200 PPI and you are sending it to an offset printer so you upsample it to 300 PPI. Is the printed photo really going to look better upsampled?

No, you're absolutely right, it will not look better. Usually much worse because of artifacts introduced by the resampling.

Printing at 200ppi will usually turn out just fine. Contrary to what people believe, it will not be noticeably less sharp. It just means you may be able to make out individual pixels (which by definition you cannot at 300).

The line screen is still 150 lpi. That's the effective resolution.

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 31, 2018

That said, I always try to keep 300 for book print and for my own images that's obviously not a problem. But if I receive a small image that has to be reproduced at less than 300, I just let it go as is.

And of course, 300 is for books and magazines. Anything to be seen from farther away requires less accordingly.