Another feature I would like to see added to Warp Stabilizer is this use case:

Suppose that you have recorded an interview but inadvertently bumped the camera for a few moments.

One approach is to stabilize the entire shot, which takes up a lot of processing time and power.

Another approach is to make a few cuts just before and after the point(s) where the bump(s) occurred and apply Warp only to the designated section between the cuts. The result, however, is at least two jumps between the previous and the next cut point, as Warp will resize the frame to accomodate for the bump(s).

It would be cool if you could instruct Warp Stabilizer to do its magic on certain parts of the recorded clip, but leave other parts untouched, setting the sizing of the preceding clip and the succeeding clip in such a manner that you won't see a visual difference.

Is that a viable thing to achieve?

The majority of issues that occur with using Warp stabilizer is when multiple things in the frame move or when you have a camera shake that translates differently to the foreground vs the background.

The result in both cases is that you get the wobble-warping effect.

So far, the only solution was to take the clip to After Effects and - in Advanced mode - start going through the clip frame by frame deleting the keypoints you don't want the stabilization to happen on (e.g. by deselecting points on a moving person separate from their background, or delete points in the foreground).

Will we see similar features in Warp in PPro?

In a recent product announcement, Blackmagic Design announced that they now use the Gyro data recorded by the sensor in their cinema line-up of cameras (URSA & Pockets) to help stabilize footage in Resolve.

When will Premiere Pro support this feature? Are you able to read out gyro data embedded in the metadata of recorded footage from said cameras?

Fast stabilization works execelent. I tried it for many videos and just few times need to change to common method.

Sad it is not in 14.9 release of premeire.

(there is some problem with warp stab which i described here https://community.adobe.com/t5/premiere-pro/warp-stabilizer-error/m-p/11760820

 but it is not about "fast stabilization", it exists it regular version of effect too..)

So, very exciting to get the feature update...  do you know what version number to expect it to arrive in (outside of the beta)?

You have to make premiere go as fast as Davinci, use the cpu to the fullest, if not people are going to davinci because adobe is very, very slow. Please there are many working on it, do it now or it will be too late and They will all migrate to DaVINCI, which from what I see on YouTube are already leaving. Thank you

I should also add, please find a way to speed up saving process. It appears Warp Stabilize saves the data inside the project file, and when you have any notable amount of clips with stabilize effects, the saving process is dramaticaly slow.  It would be nice if the stabilize data was stored seperate from the project file, and that way any save requests would be fast.

Something that maybe would be worth while doing short term, is at least with auto-save, to avoid resavings the stabilze data.  I have projects that can take over 5 min to save because of the stabilization data in an autosave.  My system is not slow, everything is on seperate NVME drives, 128GB and an RTX 3090 video card...  the warp stabilize contributes significantly to the save time of projects files and slows down the edits.  I have resorted to stabilization, then export each clip, and then import them back into the project to avoid this limitation.

Okay this is exciting news....

Can I add one suggestion for the team,  can you add a way to "exclude" parts of the frame from how itcalculates the stabilze?  Not sure how big of deal it would be to most people, but I sometimes find that it helps to have a way to ignor parts of the video frame.  Right now if Warp Stabilize fails to work well enough, I switch over to Mocha (so I can exclude stuff), but I prefer the simplicty and more automatic modes of Warp Stabilize. 

As a second suggestion,  can you make it so that if you are doing multiple clips at the same time, that it works better when you have 10 clips or more being processed.  I like to have it process the footage, then tweak the settings for each clip.

Would be nice to also add ability after a past effect command to automaticaly start the process too :-), not trying to be greedy, but I had to ask.

About time. I'm sure this was a top 5 user voice post on a regular basis look forward to trying this out.