As noted already, shooting in 4K can certainly provide a great deal of leverage for editing, as it allows you to "zoom in" or reframe things which can in some cases be very helpful. But maybe you are framing and shooting clean and will have no need to do so.
Assuming you have no need/intention of ever wanting to deliver as 4K, consider these things:
- 4K files require more storage, both in camera and in edit system
- 4K files require a faster computer for smooth playback and editing, will take longer to render/convert to HD delivery format.
Depending on the camera used, if you only "need" HD delivery, the camera might provide better quality in HD mode. For example, the Sony X70 camera records HD as 10-bit 4:2:2 at 50mbps, while 4K uses 8-bit 4:2:0 color at 100mbps. So if you only intend to deliver at HD resolution or less, then the 10-bit 4:2:2 recording is actually superior quality with more color data and less compression! Some might argue that when downscaling 4K to HD it may be possible to recoup more color info...that's debatable.
While I don't disagree with Jim that 4K acquisition provides the best possible quality regarding resolution, future-proofing, and offering reframing options, it may not be ideal for everyone depending on what they are creating and delivering. An all-HD workflow may be perfect for some projects and not for others.
Thanks
Jeff Pulera