Skip to main content
Community Expert
January 22, 2026
Question

Inconsistent marker behaviour when ripple editing

  • January 22, 2026
  • 2 replies
  • 54 views

I’m seeing inconsistent timeline marker behaviour when using different ripple-editing methods in Premiere Pro since version 25.3.

 

In earlier versions, ripple edits did not delete markers. Since 25.3, it’s now easy to unintentionally delete markers depending on how a ripple edit is performed.

 

Example setup:

  1. Create a sequence with two clips back-to-back.
  2. Place a timeline marker at the start of the second clip.
  3. Trim the head of the second clip

 

Observed behaviour:

Edit method Resulting marker behaviour
Ripple Edit Tool Marker moves earlier in the timeline, shifting onto the preceding clip
Ripple Trim shortcut (Q) Marker is deleted
In/Out points + Extract Marker is deleted
Cut + Sequence > Ripple Delete Marker remains at the start of the second clip
Standard Delete or Sequence > Clear Marker is preserved

 

There needs to be clearer, more consistent rules around marker behaviour during ripple edits. Alternatively, this could be addressed with an option in the Markers menu (for example, “Ripple Edits Delete Sequence Markers”).

2 replies

JonesVid
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 25, 2026

Hi @R Neil Haugen 

 

Who was the Adobe staff member who replied?.

Were they able to point you at specific documentation describing the correct designed behaviour?.

 

In my opinion Ripple Edit is now totally wrong. That's just one opinion, but many others seem to have made similar comments.

Stan Jones
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 25, 2026

@JonesVid @PaulMurphy,

 

See the several @Ben Insler posts in this thread:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/premiere-pro-discussions/in-25-3-ripple-trim-edit-to-playhead-deletes-markers-at-the-ends/m-p/15377101#M568922

 

There is a new intended behavior, and there was a bug that has since been fixed.

 

Stan

 

R Neil Haugen
Legend
January 23, 2026

A staffer replied on another thread that this is now intended behavior and quite needed for some workflows.

 

When you have sequence markers and are hitting this as a problem, they suggested to use Lift to remove the section rather than Extract.

Everyone's mileage always varies ...