• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
1

Red Giant Magic Bullet Denoiser III VS Neat Video

Guide ,
May 31, 2020 May 31, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello Everyone.

Shooting Cinema Raw 12 Bit with Canon C-200, I see lots of Noise. I do have the Magic Bullet Denoiser III, but it slows down the Premiere, and when I play with the slider I can't see the actual Denoise. What do you recommend, please?

Thank you very much.

 

TOPICS
Export , How to , Performance , User interface or workspaces

Views

10.4K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Jun 01, 2020 Jun 01, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hey, 

 

I have tried both.

The Neat video version 5 has been amazing. Apart from better noise reduction in general it was much faster. I ran a few tests... Can't remember exact timings but it was so significant that I removed Denoiser and only using Neat video 5 now. 

 

Hope this helps in terms of vouching for a comparison.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Guide ,
May 21, 2023 May 21, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Thanks for the reply. I have a fairly strong computer:

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900K CPU @ 3.70GHz 3.60 GHz

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

64.0 GB RAM.

Also, I struggle with Lagging, Slowness.

Thanks

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 01, 2020 Jun 01, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Download trials and find out for yourself.

Everybody has a different opinion

I use DE:Noise - RE:Vision Effects 

 

In most cases you have to render first in order to get playback.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Guide ,
Jun 03, 2020 Jun 03, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 01, 2020 Jun 01, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

My experience with a number of effects has been that the interface has been much more responsive if I use aftereffects rather than premiere for them.    This has been particularly true for a variety of keying effects and for Neat.  I don't have the most highpowered machine so your milage may vary.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Jun 01, 2020 Jun 01, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I forgot to mention. 

 

What works for me in Neat Video is the performance function that allows you to configure what is used for this effect. CPU or GPU, or both and also what combination of both and how much GPU use you would like to allocate...  By tweaking this combination I have seen fairly impressive time savings. 

 

The DE:Noise option that was mentioned here looks like something I would like to test.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines