Skip to main content
ScottDon
Participant
March 13, 2018
Question

4k in a 1080 timeline - Proxy workflow - Resolve

  • March 13, 2018
  • 4 replies
  • 3195 views

Hi all,

Please forgive me if I've missed an explanation in the existing discussions.

I have some 4k UHD footage, which I intend to deliver at 1080.

I'm a little confused as to the best workflow-

- transcoding all the footage down to 1080

- working with 4k (proxies) in a 1080 timeline

- or working with 4k (proxies) in a 4k timeline - then exporting 1080.

I've heard that when working 4k footage delivered to 1080, the image is more clear and defined than if shot in HD. Would this be the case in all of the above scenarios? Would some yield better results than others? Can artefacts be an issue?

One thing to consider, is the sequence will eventually be flattened down and sent to Resolve. Will staying with the 4k media allow for a better grade from the higher res images?

All help appreciated.

Footage will be 4k UHD from the Sony A7Sii - XAVC-S Codec.

MBP 2.5GHz i7

16GB DDR3

AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2 GB

Intel Iris Pro 1536 MB

This topic has been closed for replies.

4 replies

Legend
March 17, 2018

One thing to consider, is the sequence will eventually be flattened down and sent to Resolve.

Ooh, I missed that the first time.  I would change my advice.

Buy and read the following:

The Definitive Guide to DaVinci Resolve 14: Editing, Color and Audio (Blackmagic Design Learning Series): Paul Saccone: …

Do all the work in Resolve.  (I've never gotten the transfer between programs to come out as good as it should.)

Legend
March 16, 2018

I think "best" is a matter of opinion.  My preference would be to edit in a 1080 sequence using Cineform proxies.

Work offline using proxy media |

I have some 4k UHD footage

On a side note, those are actually two different things.

4K = 4096 x 2160

UHD = 3840 x 2160

Inspiring
March 16, 2018

If I were coloring a flattened sequence in Resolve, I'd want to stay at max resolution.  I'd transcode the footage to ProRes 422 UHD 4K, edit (I've cut 4K 4096 X 2160 ProRes on my 2013 MacBook Pro no problem using a thunderbolt drive and by setting the Program monitor quality to 1/2 which looks on my Apple Thunderbolt display the same as Full quality), and export a flattened 4K file for Resolve.

I'd create a 4K MASTER of the project for sure, and use that to generate any and all media requirements. 

That's me, anyways.  I believe in staying at top quality throughout a project.

Kevin-Monahan
Community Manager
Community Manager
March 15, 2018

Hi ScottDon,

If a smooth workflow and faster rendering are more important to you, then the first option is best if you can transcode to a smart rendering codec.

More info about smart rendering on export here.

Thanks,
Kevin

Kevin Monahan - Sr. Community and Engagement Strategist – Adobe Pro Video and Audio