Sorry to have been delayed in answering. Once I learned that I could edit map IDs I was on a roll. I've just delivered the OLH. I consider it flawed for other reasons, having to do with seeing the filenames in the Search list (WebHelp) and some formatting issues around numbered and bulleted lists. However, I'll post questions on those items elsewhere---I think I saw at least one of those in my Forum page-down this afternoon.
I appreciate this well-thought out workflow! I'm studying it.
I believe the differences between our workflows (aside from you being far more experienced at it than I!) probably have to do with you being in TCS1.3, and also that I'm working with an inexperienced client. (The blind leading the blind, basically.)
In my case the client stated very sincerely that they wanted CSH, and I've spent hours learning how to make that happen :-). In point of fact, though, they've never had CSH before and don't have a clue yet how to apply it to the product. (I've sent them Chpt 11 of the Robo 8 user guide for reference.) Getting map ID numbers from the engineering group is a bit advanced for this situation. :-)
In fact I won't have a good test of whether or not my map file even works for a month or so. They budgeted no time on this release cycle to test the CSH system in place. Instead they plan to apply it in a product update. I plan to experiment with your settings and see if I can get something better to them before then.
My marker name is FileName. My File > Project Settings > Edit conversion settings... > Other settings are:
Context Sensitive Help Marker: blank --- according to your workflow, this should be FileName
Topic Name Pattern: grayed out but is "(Default)"
Topic Name Marker: FileName --- so should this be blank instead?
I also have chapter titles and head levels 1, 2, and 3 set for pagination, but I understand that having the Topic Name Marker field active disables paragraph pagination settings in favor of using the topic name marker.
I will continue to experiment. I appreciate your time, btw. (If you have a little more, I'd welcome answers to the settings questions above.)
I've learned a lot hanging out in various Forums, but have much more to learn.
Anne
Hi Anne,
Yes, the Context Sensitive Help Marker in your case should be FileName.
The Topic Name Pattern and Topic Name Marker should have no effect on the CSH. These affect the FM headings or sections that will be converted into RH topics. Although, I don't have Topic Name Marker in my version of RH, but if my assumption is wrong, I'm sure someone can correct me. Granted, if you don't select the right FM headings or sections to convert into RH topics, then any CSH issues are secondary.
The key components of creating context-sensitive help with the TCS are the FM CS markers and the RH Map ID definitions.
And don't worry too much about the Engineering group. I, too, have had to work with engineers inexperienced with generating CSH, but they'll figure it out.
Good luck!