15
Replies
The girl doesn't seem to have an eye; her necklace becomes part of the jacket zipper? her fingers are poorly drawn. Who is holding the glass of purple stuff? The rim of the glass is poorly drawn. His jacket has 2 rows of zippers which aren't well drawn. You have two many compound words in the keyword list. Terms such as "product selection", "urban lifestyle", "youth culture", "store interior" should be separated into 2 keywords. This keyword list looks suspiciously like it was generated by an AI bot...
There are numerous issues in each image, and I've only pointed out a few of the most obvious. You need to review your images at 100% to 200% percent and move from corner to corner to look for errors.
02 Sales: White border!
That border would earn you a “Non-compliant Image” refusal.
Check the anatomy (red) and you have a white border (yellow):
In addition, you have aliasing. Your floor contains a pattern that looks a lot like half patterns like on a scanned document.
What is that:
(look also at the unsteady out of focus rendering).
Hands:
(also: where is the red bag fixed?)
What is that element in front of the handles?
(do you see the compression artefacts on the clothing?)
Leg one is thicker than leg two:
How is that cloth fixed?
Creepy look with compression artefacts:
Reminds me of a dog's snout in comic books:
22 Sales:
Creepy look:
What does she hold how in her hands? The bent cup seems to float.
The necklace disappears somewhere in the jacket:
Nice ear for an extraterrestrial in Star Trek:
(I'm stopping here. The characters are too soft, like upscaled with an early Photoshop version)
05 Sales:
Look at her feet:
And she has a monster handbag in her hand, that might still work, but what about the shoulder strap?
Floating handbags have not yet been invented, but they could be very practical:
Modern clothing:
The hand also looks a bit horrible. Please explain what (1) is?
The dog's fur has a plastic look:
What is that?
(I really love the carpet on the rolling stairs, where can I get something like that?)
I could easily continue. Check your assets for consistency, artefacts, and geometry errors. It's not because something called “generative AI” has rendered these creatures, that they are correct. Faces, hands, feet, clothing, anything geometrically designed could be rendered erroneously. The more complex your setting is, the more errors you will have, and the more issues need to be cleaned up.
As you submitted many assets that were full of errors, you got many refusals. Submit first one asset, after checking it for errors and correcting what could be corrected. If you earn a refusal, check here for the reasons. Use that experience to correct your next asset and then submit that. Keep your assets simple. Here, less is less work to correct.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
This one has a number of problems with bad symmetry, missing parts, odd angles and poorly drawn details.
The model on the right is a mish mash of conflicting angles. And her shoes/feet are weird.
Good luck.
AdChoices
.jpg){kind=link}
