Participating Frequently

Answered

AI images refused for "quality issues" - critique welcome

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
January 12, 2024
5 replies
1464 views

While my normal images get almost always approved, my AI images (generated via Midjourney, mostly version 6, upscaled directly in Midjourney, never using a reference image (except my own) or reference to other autors in the prompt) are often being refused for "quality issues". My impression is that the decisions about what is approved and what is rejected are sometimes completely random. I would really appreciate some feedback from the reviewers so that I don't waste my time and Midjourney credits but there isn't any. Could I ask what the problems with these images are? Thank you.

(I have uploaded 10 images below - there is more but 10 is maximum I can upload here. I had to reduce their size otherwise they couldn't be uploaded. I can imagine that with some of the images the problem could be in oversharpening that Midjourney does when upscaling, or that someone is worried about the gibberish numbers and letters written on the chip, but what is wrong with double exposure and glitch effect, or with a 3D generated brain, or with a message written on the screen of a computer? Especially when it is AI generated so it can hardly be a copyright protected font?)

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer oleschwander

O

oleschwanderCorrect answer

Legend

H

Hwaenthong33712475q9iq

Participant

I'm sorry to disappoint you. I don't know how to use it. I didn't know
before. I will reduce the size and not overwrite the hole.I miss you and
miss you the most.

Abambo

Community Expert

I'm sorry to disappoint you. I don't know how to use it. I didn't knowbefore. I will reduce the size and not overwrite the hole.I miss you andmiss you the most.
By @Hwaenthong33712475q9iq

Irrelevant comment. Please abstain from this.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

O

oleschwander

Legend

Abambo

Community Expert

For the chips, this could represent a quality issue:

The writing is less a problem, as it is clean, even if it is nonsense. The lanes on the board are also between good and bad. You do not look hard to find auality issues here.

Your brain has an aliasing problem.

(as a side note: checking assets takes a lot of time, and referring to assets gets complicated, when there are a lot of them. We would like to see peaple restricting to one to three assets. When everybody has commented on those three assets, you could ask follow-up questions, with a different aset. This helps us, saving time, and you, getting good advice on those images.)

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Madeleine24Author

Participating Frequently

I thought it wouldn't be welcome if I spam with several different posts and ask for each image separately. I just thought there would be some common issues that I don't see.

Believe it or not, to me it also takes a lot of time to generate and keyword and sometimes retouch those images, so I wanted to finally get some feedback other than "quality issues", and not just for 1-3 images. I don't get how it is saving time to split the 10 selected images into 3-10 comments but I will do that next time, thanks.

Thanks for your feedback anyway.

Abambo

Community Expert

I don't get how it is saving time to split the 10 selected images into 3-10 comments but I will do that next time, thanks.

Thanks for your feedback anyway.

By @Madeleine24

The trick is to get one or two assets commented on and then checking the other ones for similar errors or in a similar way, so that at the long, you do not need help to anymore to analyze refusals. Very often errors are of a similar nature, so this saves effectively time.

We are all contributors, so we know that editing and keywording takes time. But we are also volunteers for this. So we are doing this in our free time.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Jill_C

Community Expert

I looked at several of the images and found the following issues:

- the man has no left hand and his right arm is too short; the woman on the right has only one leg.

- poorly drawn branches in the floral image

-" Bitcoin" is trademarked in the U.K. The coin is oval shaped.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Madeleine24Author

Participating Frequently

Thank you. I wouldn't say the silhouette of the woman has just one leg - to me it's just one leg covered by the other as she is walking, and as far as bitcoin is concerned, I'm a bit confused because there are hundreds of thousands of bitcoin images on stock agencies including Adobe Stock. In any case, thank you for taking the time to answer!

Abambo

Community Expert

I wouldn't say the silhouette of the woman has just one leg - to me it's just one leg covered by the other as she is walking,

By @Madeleine24

Strange walk:

It just doesn't work.

As for Bitcoin: just because others ha assets passed, that won't guarantee you the same. Trademarks won't pass, but I think that the Bitcoin logo should pass on the IP grounds. Did the rejection reason mention IP?

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded