Participant

Answered

Ai images refused

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
January 9, 2024
5 replies
3318 views

Hello guys, time ago i posted some images generated with Midjourney v4 and v5. They got accepted. I post an example:

Now i'm posting other images generated with Midjourney v 5 (again) and v6 and aren't getting accepted. I don't understand why cause the quality is the same (v 4 has very noisy images so it makes nonsense they got accepted but now v 5 and 6 images no). I post an example of 1 that got refused:

Can someone please explain me what's exactly the problem?

Contributors

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Jill_C

Noise is not the only quality aspect on which images are judged. The first (accepted) image was actually more cohesive in terms of drawing details. The second image has numerous drawing errors and artifacts.

Abambo

Community Expert

@Taiwan97,

This thread is now locked. If you want to make additions or remarks, send me a direct message.

Thanks.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Jill_C

Correct answer

Community Expert

Noise is not the only quality aspect on which images are judged. The first (accepted) image was actually more cohesive in terms of drawing details. The second image has numerous drawing errors and artifacts.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

O

oleschwander

Legend

In any case, a mistake is that the roof of the tower to the right is not fully drawn. And maybe the green lanterns shoud be alike.

daniellei4510

Community Expert

Possibly, because "time ago," AI assets were being accepted by untrained moderators with regard to this new medium. People with 6 fingers, etc. It's much more difficult now to get AI assets accepted and the bar has been raised (if you're playing high jump; lowered if you're playing limbo).

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

S

shaky camera

Known Participant

Do you know that is the case? A lot more of my images have been rejected recently. I was wondering if it was what DALL-E generated, the uspcaler or Adobe themselves. If it is actually down to a far more stringent acceptance process then that is fair enough.

O

oleschwander

Legend

@AbamboNobody talked about RAW images? Wait. You wrote "When I submit high ISO photographs, I have a lot of noise that is inherently connected to the technology used. They get refused if I do not compensate for that. "

Are you telling me that you shoot JPG and submit that? Instead of developed RAW images?

I had wery low opinion about your "expertise", but if you shoot JPG? Now i am very concerned for the people that are taking your advices on these forums seriously.

To quote you "Using a technology with limited capabilities is not an excuse for bad assets."

And yet, adobe is still accepting ai generated images that are full of errors. Every single one of them.

Go figure. Wonder why they do that 😉

Maybe write adobe a protest note?

As for my sentence construction.

Checked with two native english speakers. Both of them had no problem understanding what i wrote.

Even do they don't know the first thing about the stock or adobe.

So. Maybe go past the google translate. Maybe use some of the AI ones.

Svetlana - the experts here are not reviewers. They are not responsible for flawed images in Adobe Stock.