AI refusal is not accepted by moderators

1.  Abstracts are not big sellers. Besides, Stock has over 57 million of them (more than they can sell).

You're competing with way too much inventory.   Save the abstracts for your own projects.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=abstract

2.  AI art is inherently flawed — bad geometry, competing light sources, poorly drawn details and other artifacts that make it unfit for commercial projects.  It takes a talented artist to see the flaws and make all necessary corrections prior to submission.   If you can do it, great.  If you can't, then take some courses to learn how.

3.  Sure, Adobe Stock could give a wholesale pass to every submission until customers complain and demand refunds.  But eventually customers would stop coming here & Stock would be out of business real fast.  Where would contributors go?  Back to a 9 to 5 job.

Snow blurred background: no DOF and this:

@Denis5FBC the point is the idea for the images are good but, you can not rely on the AI to produce perfect images that customrs are willing to pay money for. Take the time to cleanup the images. Here is another example of the poor quality in your images.

On the super shallow depth of field images, I've always seen a lot of those posted here as rejections regardless if its taken with a camera or generated with AI.  Those are rarely accepted from what I've seen on the forums, there is just too much out of focus and it's easy enough to apply blur as a filter in Photoshop.  The snow in one of these looked like a filter to me which could lead to a rejection as well.

As for the rest, I was able to spot generation errors in almost all of them.  Zoom in on the bows of the presents, I found a lot of subtle generation errors there.  Many of the tree tops were cut off.  In one of the room images, the plant on the table continued through the window.

I hope this perspective helps!

Hello,
I have had the same problem as you recently. It seems that images generated by AI are increasingly refused. I think Adobe wants to make a more qualitative selection. Out of 100 images submitted, I only have 15 that got through whereas before, I had 3/4 or even all of them.
Also, I have the impression that they have implemented an image pre-qualification algorithm because I have images which are refused after 1 day, something which did not exist before. They were refused after a few weeks.

I really hope someday that AI artist will stop working for quantity and start working for quality. That will reduce the time needed for reviewers to reject the huge amount of AI generated images that are in error. It will also increase the number of approved images and will help the contributors sales.

Here 10 images were posted. Sorry but I only looked at the first image and immediately found an error that is AI typical.

Looking further I see more than 10 mistakes. 

For instance, look at the first step of the stairs and the table. Where does one begin where does it end? Why is there a hole in it?

Please review your images and edit out the mistakes.

(here the first mistake that I saw)