Anyone submitting AI notice the increase in rejections all of a sudden? They keep rejection my item

The same with me, only two was accepted.  I don't submit AI only, I upload photography also and most real photo was accepted.  I have to learn more how to generate AI.

I created a post like this the other day. Previously my rejections were about 25% but currently they are about 80/90%

Yes, the rejections are up to 100% in the last weeks.

For comparison, i am also uploading the images to other portals, and images that do great there, are not accepted here.

Which for me sounds, like a loss for Adobe, because other sited are making money from it, but adobe does not.

It is also not a question of quality. I have sold a few images here, and many from my new uploads are cleaner, have removed "wrong" details, and stil no aprovement.

It just feels like more random than before. Well, now i use adobe mainly as "tag generator" for other uploading platforms 🙂 

I see that in every platform there are bitter people who are losing their "market share" to AI. Maybe it is scary when an program can deliver results that are comparable or even better, than a human that has learned years to do that.

So the AI users are getting the hate 🙂 I think it will calm down in the next few years, but as for now, we are comming in the "I am an real artist and i hate AI, this is not a real art ! " time 🙂 

Good enough doesn't cut it anymore.  The quality bar is ever-rising as AI generators & upscalers up their game and Contributors get better at writing prompts and editing their work in post-production.  You're competing with some highly talented people who don't mess around.

Successful Contributors are always seeking ways to improve the quality of their artwork to meet the discerning customer's demands.  Would you rather have more rejections today or a flurry of angry customer complaints & refund requests later? 

Adobe Stock Reviewers must look at assets and decide if this work is good enough for today's buyer and will it remain good enough 6-12 months from now?  A good reputation & longevity are important to the success of Adobe Stock.  Remember this isn't social media, it's a royalty-free assets business.  Quality matters here.

If this doesn't suit you, you're free to submit artwork to other microstock services and see what they say. 

You are certainly welcom to sell on Etsy. Adobe does not have a policy of exclusivity. So may do both?

I agree with @RALPH_L , it's hard to give meaningful advice without seeing the rejected assets.

@David287897922ff2 , same message.  If you want genuine advice, start a new post with few assets for peer review.  We aren't fakes as you say, but other contributors just like you.

Yeah, the change has been noticeable. Until now I had around 40 % approval rate, but this month it's been 100 % rejections no matter what I do. I can understand if they were more demanding now and just a few of them got accepted, the problem is not a single one got approved and I keep getting rejections every day so it feels like they will block everything for some unknown reason while hiding behind "Quality issues".

Then they have some fakers on here telling people the problem is obviously the focus or some pixel in a corner so they don't raise their voice protesting much. My theory, they have too many pictures of every theme so they want to reduce the amount of work by scaring away the dispensable creators. It seems you and me are in this cathegory.

I noticed that previously it took around 1 month for them to decide on my pictures and now it's just a week or two before they get rejected. It's obvious they're getting faster at it because they're not even looking at them, they're just clicking at the X.

I don't think a company that is actively promoting its own AI generating platform is getting "fed up" with AI. Rather, they are being more stringent with AI that is not necessarily bad but AI that is less than as perfect as it could be. 

It would be nice if you could upload 1 or 2 rejected images for us to review.