Skip to main content
Participant
March 10, 2023
Answered

Complaint against the author

  • March 10, 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 2048 views

Этот автор публикует генеративный контент без надлежащего дизайна, чтобы легко пройти модерацию. По многим признакам (неправильные линии, вариации одного изображения, особый стиль) видно, что эти изображения созданы в Миджорни. В портфолио автора много генеративных изображений. Пожалуйста, исправьте ситуацию.


https://stock.adobe.com/ca/contributor/4021/photobank

 

   

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Contributor1

Hello, I've reported this specific contributor to the content team for review for lacking generative AI labels. I've sent along this forum thread as well to the content team to make sure they understand the full scope of the issue. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the assets.

3 replies

Contributor1Community ManagerCorrect answer
Community Manager
March 10, 2023

Hello, I've reported this specific contributor to the content team for review for lacking generative AI labels. I've sent along this forum thread as well to the content team to make sure they understand the full scope of the issue. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the assets.

Fabiobtex
Participating Frequently
March 10, 2023

This monkey photo being aproved makes me feel stupid to be on this forum, how can I point out defects in images as grounds for rejection while things like this are approved?

A few days ago, a person who had been waiting for more than 10 days was advised to cancel the submission because he had not entered the mandatory keywords. For what?

I'm not even going to mention my images, perfectly corrected after hours of editing being rejected.

85gbAuthor
Participant
March 10, 2023

Yes, I feel the same way. Someone waits a month for the approval of photos, and someone puts THIS out in batches without any problems

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 10, 2023
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
85gbAuthor
Participant
March 10, 2023

the author does not specify this as generative ai

Known Participant
March 10, 2023

I saw. Contributor1 is the contact I know, from Adobe, who checks complaints and moves those over to the team to give assets a second look. 

 

I think it should be very important for Adobe to enforce the rules. 

 

Maybe @Paul_RNRS can tell us the approximate date of the upload of those.


The most recent of these was uploaded on the 28th of February. The oldest (516136865) goes back to July last year, which definitely looks like it was made by one of the earlier generative algorithms. 

 

There are lots of accounts that break the rules in this way, should we name them??! Some are even making it into the top seller list.