Skip to main content
HaraLine
Participant
June 27, 2023
Answered

Could someone please provide advice on the reasons behind the rejection of these pictures?

  • June 27, 2023
  • 4 replies
  • 3969 views

Are these AI-generated pictures being rejected due to the out-of-focus background? Any advice regarding this matter would be highly appreciated.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

How on EARTH is someone managing to upload thousands of assets a week??

When I was making AI Images

1) I had to first brainstorm the idea,

2) Then run it through midjourney..(usually at least twice to get what I actually wanted)

3) Upscale it

4) write up a property release via a pdf editor release if it needed one

5) upscale the property release

6) upload the image to adobe stock

7) write tags

😎 submit the property release

9) pray it doesn't get rejected 

 

All this takes time and you say one guy is doing THOUSANDS?

does he have literally no life?

That's insane........

 

 

and i'm not sure if people should even be allowed to discriminate and filter out AI Images. It's a bit like racism ..but for pictures lol.

 

 


quote

and i'm not sure if people should even be allowed to discriminate and filter out AI Images. It's a bit like racism ..but for pictures lol.


By @Anthony280912442jrz

Well, customers asked for that. If a customer wants a real person instead of a fake one, they want a real person. And as it's the customer who pays, they are king.

 

But the reason behind those furious demands from the customers was and is the bad quality of AI assets. Six fingers, three hands, six legs… and artefacts, artefacts and artefacts. You name the fault, you get it!

4 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 28, 2023

3.52... : Artefacts in the out of focus area:

but also with the glass and the chips:

The whole image does not look to be very sharp.

3.32xx: Obviously, as you use the same process, you find the same or similar artefacts.

I agree with @Test Screen Name 's mutant olive. Looks nice, but not realistic. In addition, the picture is not level. The stick is also somewhat strange:

 

3.42XX: idem. In addition, what really stroke my eyes was this item:

If you can explain the physics of that, you will get nominated for the Nobel Prize.

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Participating Frequently
June 28, 2023

"If you can explain the physics of that, you will get nominated for the Nobel Prize."

 

I'm dead 😂😂🤣

 

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 28, 2023
quote

I'm dead 😂😂🤣


By @Anthony280912442jrz

But I hope only generative AI death! 😉

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Participating Frequently
June 28, 2023

at a quick glace I can't spot nothing wrong with it. Had you uploaded that before February it would have gone through no problems but since then the flood of AI images has got so great that they are now really really picky over AI images and will study your image under a microscope and literally nitpick at everything..

 

How much are you earning from your AI pictures? I had about 50 images images up that were getting the occasional  download between janruary and april but since then absolutely nothing and i suspect it's to do with increased competition due the floods of people looking to get rich quick off AI images...

 

anyways i've stopped uploading anything for like 3 months now. The Return On Investment for this just isn't worth my time..

 

HaraLine
HaraLineAuthor
Participant
June 28, 2023

I mistakenly submitted my assets as PNG files, despite them not having a transparent background. To rectify this, I have promptly deleted the incorrect assets and resubmitted them in the appropriate format. I got 2 approved this morning. 

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 28, 2023
quote

I mistakenly submitted my assets as PNG files, despite them not having a transparent background. To rectify this, I have promptly deleted the incorrect assets and resubmitted them in the appropriate format.


By @HaraLine

That's good practice to delete when you recognize the error. For submitting the wrong format, you should get a “Non-compliant Image” refusal.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 27, 2023

I agree with the comments of @Test Screen Name. Each of these images have rendering errors in one or more of the objects in the frame. Additionally, you should not be submitting AI assets in PNG format.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
HaraLine
HaraLineAuthor
Participant
June 27, 2023

Thank you for the response. It is much appeciated. What format should the assets should be submitted in? 

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 27, 2023

Generative AI assets should be jpg. PNG should only be used for images with a transparent background.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Legend
June 27, 2023

Since these are photorealistic they will be checked for realisticness. It's a weakness of much AI work, often needing a lot of time consuming correction. My opinions (for what they are worth):

#1 - out of focus is fine, but I don't think the background out of focusness is realistic, especially the light spots.And what shape is the table?

#2 - that's one strange mutant olive

#3 - shadow from glassware is too sharp and the light angles are wrong. But more to the point, what is that thing behind the glass, or perhaps through the glass, and what is holding it up.

HaraLine
HaraLineAuthor
Participant
June 27, 2023

Thank you, that was helpful.