17
Replies
It seems to me the support community here isn't super AI friendly. I suggest you check out Reddit for more info about AI image generation and how to get the most out of it.
By @Angela Micheli Otwell
No, not really. But that may be because this is about quality and not about jamming the system. I'm not against AI, but what I see here is not persuading. And I look at AI art the same way I would look at standard art and photography.
What I should have said is that I'm not going to discuss AI techniques in depth here, and to my knowledge, no one else is dicussing AI techniques much here, either, so I think Reddit is a better source of information.
By @Angela Micheli Otwell
That is correct. If you have any links, that could help the AI artists here.
Upscaling is not allowed.
By @Angela Micheli Otwell
You nail it. Upscaling does not create new information, it enhances only the imperfections. In my professional career, I did a lot of upscaling, and mostly on bad quality photographs. You need to invest a lot of time to get a decent print quality. When customers buy an asset at a certain resolution, they expect that it is perfect at that resolution. That's it.
In fact, I've been a traditional media artist for decades, and I'm starting to think it's just easier to make traditional art than acceptable AI art. (I'm having a great time playing with this new technology, though.)
By @Angela Micheli Otwell
I think that approach is missing with many AI art creators. They never did traditional art and think that they can ask the machine to do a perfect picture. It's a tool. It's new. It will evolve.
I doubt its the cutout work though. I do that part manually, not a background remover, which I find dont do a great job. I might have been under the impression that Gigapixel AI improved quality, rather than just enlarging the photo...still not sure.
By @UltraMachineBlue
1: is a cutout error. In a perfect cutout, you would only see a thin line around the object.
2+the cloud: are errors by the generator, and they are getting worse by upscaling. Even on this small extract, I see multiple other errors.
A bow tie like this is best done in a 3D rendering program.
Your other bow tie is also having multiple AI errors and has a huge cutout problem:
The red dots mean that there is some kind of transparency. In a perfect cutout, there would be only one (thicker) red line around your object. I wonder, however, about that regular pattern inside the object. You also have multiple errors generated by your AI. Again, a 3D rendering would be more appropriate for this object.
As an Engineer (in microelectronics) I can assure you that your “microchip” is nonsense, but for stock that is probably not a refusal reason. But the artistic quality is also awful. The cutout work is bad:
The asset quality is also bad, as you see massively artefacts at 100%:
Your Bowtie4 is a file naming error, but that is not a refusal reason. This bad artefacts are:
Cutout work:
I think you get it…
Just for the background: I did cutout work as part of my job for more than 30 years. If you worked for me, you would get a 2-hour training on cutout, before you would start.
AdChoices
