Feedback on rejected photos

[Alessia27242692d0ic]

Hello everyone,

in order to improve I would like to have a feedback on this photos that have been rejected for Quality Issues. 

Thank you very much for your time, 

Best regards 

[RALPH_L]

Photo 1: Color noise, blurry, under exposed shadows.

Photo 3: Exposure and focus.

Photo 4: Sensor spot.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Your first: noise (

), focus, exposure, framing.

Your second: over saturation, focus, exposure, white balance.

Your third: focus

noise, exposure

(no blacks, missing contrast).

The quality of the assets here is bad, but as a matter of a fact, flower pictures are very well represented in the database, so your asset needs to be wonderful. So even a simple flower picture, otherwise correctly presented, could get a refusal for quality issues if there is the slightest blemish.

Your last: sensor dust

, noise, focus, contrast, exposure. In addition, it is leaning, and I don't see very much commercial appeal to this one.

[Abambo]

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

If you are a generative AI contributor, please look into these instructions and follow them by the letter: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td...

[Jill_C]

pianta leccese 1.jpg - zoom in >100% and you'll easily see the noise and the lack of focus 

parco inganni 4.jpg - zoom in and inspect the tree carefully and you'll see that it is not in focus 

fiore blu 2.jpg - same issues here here - underexposed and unfocused 

antenna lampione 1.jpg - @RALPH_L pointed out the sensor spot in the sky; additionally I would point out that such an image lacks commercial appeal.