fotos rechazadas

[JOSE ANTONIO0D4C]

Me han rechazado una serie completa de fotos querria saber el motivo exasto para poder corregirlo ya que estan hechas con un gran angular que he comprado de segunda mano y me gustaria saber el motivo del rechazo por si es culpa del objetivo

Saludos y gracias   

[JOSE ANTONIO0D4C]

Est4e es uno de los archivos rechazados os pongo varios a ver si puedo saber el porque 

[Test Screen Name]

1. Adobe GAVE a reason for the rejection. They always do. There may not be enough detail, perhaps we can help. Please tell us the rejection reason.

2. As you may know, Adobe will look at all parts of your picture at 100%-200%. So we can help you, we need to do the same. Please upload complete original files - not new copies, not reduced, not watermarked.

[Abambo]

The images submitted are not the full-size assets as submitted to Adobe stock. In addition, Adobe gives for each asset a refusal reason. Mostly they are “Quality Issues”, but they also can be “Intellectual Property Refusal” or “Aesthetic or Commercial Appeal of Image”, or similar.

We will need to know the refusal reason, and you will need to post the image as submitted.

With what you posted here, I can see framing errors, but I doubt that they would have disqualified your asset.

[JOSE ANTONIO0D4C]

El motivo del rechazo es problema de calidad, pero me gustaria saber cual es el problema exacto para solucionerlo ya que es un obletivo comprado de ocacion y no se si es problema del objetivo o mio 

Adjunto los archivos 

[Jill_C]

The first image has sensor or lens spots in the sky. The second image has numerous logos would need to be edited out, and the composition is not really very pleasing. 

[Abambo]

First:

(there are more). You will need to clean your sensor. Sensor spots are especially visible against the sky and in high contrast. They are normally easy to correct, however. The contrast of the image is too high, you do not see details of the tractor and the machine.  You have chromatic noise and chromatic aberration. Chromatic aberration is a (normal) lens defect. Higher quality lenses do have less chromatic aberration, but all lenses have. There are artefacts in the water. The borders are falling off in sharpness. Depending on the lens, that may also be normal. Chromatic aberration is strongest at the borders. The picture is over processed.

Second: noise  and chromatic aberration. The composition is bad, and every logo needs to be edited out.

(there are more)

Third: Sensor spots, too high contrast, artefacts, noise. The man walking the dog needs to submit a model release. The logos on the bay watch stand may or may not pose a problem. Chromatic aberration:

Your first issue is your hard editing. A second is that you have difficulties with the composition. Your third is the sensor spots. Your lens, finally, has chromatic aberration where I would expect them. It may also fall off at the borders. If it's a prime lens, it's not very sharp, but that may also be the photographer using the wrong settings.

[JOSE ANTONIO0D4C]

Ok gracias ya he contactado con el vendedor de la lente y la he cambiado por otra de mejos calidad, por eso queria la informacion de los motivos de la no aceptacion 

Gracias de nuevo

[Abambo]

You're welcome.

[Ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Don't forget about the lighting. It is very harsh/strong in these photos! It is not only the lens. Consider the time of day!