Skip to main content
maxp33664242
Participant
September 1, 2023
Answered

Generative AI content .... ????

  • September 1, 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 792 views

Unreported Generative AI content

Are you serious?

 

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer RALPH_L

The Moderstors do not study your exif data. I think they selected the wrong rejection reason code. It should have been rejected for quality issues due to the excessive noise in the sky.


In addition, there is a white halo around the mountain.

Naturaly, the signature is a no go.

3 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 2, 2023

What is the relation with Fotolia?

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 2, 2023

Do you have a question, what was the rejection reason? If an image contains watermarks it will get rejected!

 

maxp33664242
Participant
September 2, 2023

Hi, thank you for your answer;

there was no watermark in the original image that I have uploaded on my personal stock space (the pic uploaded in this post is just a low res from my personal web site, this is the reason why you see ; if you can read my previous answer, you can understand what I mean...

 

thanks you

 

 

 

maxp33664242
Participant
September 2, 2023

"..(the pic uploaded in this post is just a low res from my personal web site, this is the reason why you see my watermark)"...

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
September 1, 2023

What is your question? You are not addressing Adobe directly here. This is a community of other stock contributors.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
maxp33664242
Participant
September 2, 2023

Hi, I'm sorry for my previous post;

I apologize, please forgive me;

 

I uploaded this picture 7 years ago on my stock contributor personal space;
this pic was refused with these possible reasons:

- Incorrect use of another artist's name.

- Generative AI content not disclosed.

 

Really? an image file from 2017, with exif data that show this is a my nikon file, they said me "Incorrect use of another artist's name" or "Generative AI content not disclosed" ... seriously?

How is it possible?

"another artist's name"???  "AI generated content"?   in the 2017 ???

 

Ok, no problem...

I don't understand, but it's ok;

 

thanks

 

RALPH_L
Community Expert
RALPH_LCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
September 2, 2023

The Moderstors do not study your exif data. I think they selected the wrong rejection reason code. It should have been rejected for quality issues due to the excessive noise in the sky.


In addition, there is a white halo around the mountain.

Naturaly, the signature is a no go.