Generative AI Images Rejected Due to Quality Issues

[Sherry31359919h1oc]

Hello, I am new here my Generative AI Images Rejected Due to Quality Issues. I can not understand the issues. Please guide me what are the issue of quality with the images.

[daniellei4510]

For the first image, you have the remnants of a watermark at the bottom left and right corners of the tree. The second one could use some sharpening.

[daniellei4510]

Oh...and there are watermarks at the top of the first image as well. Watermarks in AI are automatic rejections, no matter how well rendered.

[Sherry31359919h1oc]

No watermark on image its in design i have more veriations that rejected too.  

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

You have many artefacts in your pictures. Check them at 100%. You will see compression artefacts and other defects.

[jacquelingphoto2017 · Accepted solution]

Hi @Sherry31359919h1oc ,

This too has the compression noise and uneven colors that are visible when zoomed.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[moe hong]

There are so many things wrong here. They look like they were made with Dall*E or a very early generation model of Midjourney. Blur, weird composition, and overall ... just mediocre. Ask yourself this: could it possibly be useful for a designer or marketer in their professional work? My general rule of thumb is that if the answer is no or just maybe, don't bother uploading it. If you want it to sell, or be accepted even, it needs to be useful.

[Sherry31359919h1oc]

Its DALL E 2 and i think its one latest AI model.

[moe hong]

Sorry to be blunt, but it looks like first-generation deep dream AI stuff, which really has almost zero commercial value. If all the little details actually were fully fleshed out and had some meaning and were at least contextually meaningful in terms of the overall image, that'd be one thing, but it's just a pretty picture without anything special to recommend it.

[daniellei4510]

One more thing: Avoid the 1:1 ratio which is the default for most AI platforms. Give potential buyers the option to crop their purchases if they see fit. 8:10, 5:7, 16:9, 24:20...there are almost an endless number of variations to choose from.

[Nancy OShea]

With all Generative AI, the devil is in the details.  AI is notoriously bad at fine details and it frequently munges things like consistent light sources and perspectives which adds to the overall Impression of pure nonsense.

In my experience, it takes 100 or more diffusion cycles with revised prompts to get 1 or 2 decent images to work with.  And it takes artistic talent and software editing skillls to make AI commercially-ready for Stock.

Keep working on it.

Before you submit, compare your work with current Stock Inventory to see if yours is better than what Stock already has.

Read these links from your Stock Contributor User Guide.
==============

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

==========
Generative AI:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html
===========
Model/Property Releases:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html

[jacquelingphoto2017 · Accepted solution]

Hi @Sherry31359919h1oc ,

These images remind me of some highly compressed thumbnails. They both have compression noise and uneven coloration when zoomed.

Best wishes

Jacquelin