Skip to main content
Participant
June 16, 2023
Answered

I uploaded AI generative images 23 images were rejected due to quality issues

  • June 16, 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 1458 views

 

 

 

 

Did I do something wrong that caused 23 images to be rejected together?
How to resolve and upload again will accept?please help me

 

THIS ISSUES

Thanks for giving us the chance to consider your image. Unfortunately, this image doesn't meet our quality standards so we can’t accept it into our collection.

Common issues that can impact the technical quality of images include exposure issues, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise. Learn more about ou

r technical requirements

I have attached 4 files please see

 

 

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo

First:

  • Artefacts

 

  •  Geometry errors: 

 

  • Unsharp.

Second: idem.

 

Third:

  • Artefacts
     
  • Illogical focus

Fourth: Focus, artefacts, perspective errors. (Just for fun: a Panda is Chinese, so you should have put the Chinese flag on the space suit…)

Your last 2: Artefacts.

 

If you correct the errors, what I doubt, except you regenerate your assets at a higher quality, you can submit again.

(BTW: you should not tick all the topics, just the relevant ones. Here: Contributor critique!)

3 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 18, 2023

Which AI diffusion service did you use? 

On close inspection, the mistakes in rendering reveal themselves.

  • Look at the U.S. Flag on astronaut's suit.
  • Examine colar on cat DJ.
  • Generative AI is poor at details.

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 16, 2023

Actually you attached 6 images, not 4. 2 or 3 are usually sufficient for the community members to comment on.

replicate-prediction-y7u5tejbljpou2m27mtdjq2gjy.jpg - the keg is not attached to the body 

replicate-prediction-6p2ekfzbv2v26rnn64u3zsxufy.jpg - the legs aren't the same size, nor are the arms, and the bubble doesn't make sense...

Deliberate_11_Create_a_photorealistic_image_of_a_nice_panda_we_1-transformed.jpg - one led is furry, the other isn't 

Deliberate_11_Create_a_photorealistic_image_of_a_ginger_cat_dr_1-transformed.jpg - the top arch of the headphones doesn't make sense; the control panel of the boombox is a blurry mess 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
June 16, 2023

First:

  • Artefacts

 

  •  Geometry errors: 

 

  • Unsharp.

Second: idem.

 

Third:

  • Artefacts
     
  • Illogical focus

Fourth: Focus, artefacts, perspective errors. (Just for fun: a Panda is Chinese, so you should have put the Chinese flag on the space suit…)

Your last 2: Artefacts.

 

If you correct the errors, what I doubt, except you regenerate your assets at a higher quality, you can submit again.

(BTW: you should not tick all the topics, just the relevant ones. Here: Contributor critique!)

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Participant
June 18, 2023

First of all thank you very much for responding. I fully understand the focus, artefacts, issues and fixes.

 

If you can help a little, I will be very helpful.
I want to show only four images. I am thinking of uploading it but I don't know if there is any problem or not.

 

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
June 18, 2023

I think the first, third and fourth images are cropped too close - part of the ear is missing. There are already ~270,000 cats in the Generative AI category, so this doesn't seem like an area in which you're likely to achieve any significant sales...


CAT2: you should correct this defect:

CAT6:

If you understand artefacts, you do not submit this one. Or, you should correct them.

CAT3:

Is not in focus (eye) and you have this artefacts:

CAT1: is out of focus (eye) and needs manual corrections of artefacts. Examples of the most obvious ones:

There are still others that may or may not pass with the asset. If they pass, they may pose problems at a later stage, when a buyer complains of the bad quality.

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer