Idea: An advanced AI tool that does a preliminary analysis of images as they are sent to you?

[alper ömer312523869uwu]

I want to share an idea with you. If there was an AI review tab next to the Adobe stock review tab. After uploading the image, the AI ​​tool will review it. It will quickly get back to us by marking the errors in the image in red and writing a description. The contributor will re-edit the image according to the error reports it receives and re-upload it. However, an Adobe employee expert will review the image the second time.

Both the workload of the employees will be lightened, and since the contributor receives help, the risk of the image being rejected will decrease, and he/she will not have to do the whole work from scratch.

I had this idea a long time ago. I usually do not want to write because I cannot reach anyone or because it sounds amateur. New AI tools have been added to Adobe stock recently. Maybe such a tool will be implemented. Also, moderators will not be exposed to the question "Why my image was rejected!!!" thousands of times 😄

(I used a translation tool for my message)

Best regards.

[Abambo]

You can use existing AI chat programs to analyze your assets. But if it would be so easy to use AI to check assets, Adobe would use it. In a few years, AI will create stock assets and AI will check it. No contributors, no moderators (and probably also no buyers, because AI will take over that part too).

[alper ömer312523869uwu]

Look, Adobe has already added AI tools to its website. Why not this tool too? Why does the topic always come down to AI taking over everything? We are already living in the midst of this technology.

[photorebelle]

@Abambo As late as possible I hope!! 

[Abambo]

@Abambo As late as possible I hope!! 

By @photorebelle

We'll see! 😂

[daniellei4510]

You're basically talking about ChatGPT. I ran a few of my accepted assets through ChatGPT and, according to the results, none of them would have been accepted. Let's leave such decisions to human moderators.

[alper ömer312523869uwu]

Wouldn't the tool that Adobe's own software developers would create have its own architecture and different operating logic? For example, Kodak had produced compact discs years ago that were designed solely for storing images. I also thought of asking Chatgpt about the errors in my images, but I thought it wouldn't be successful because it was developed as a language model. I don't know much anyway.

If the tool I mentioned raises concerns that it could put human moderators out of work, don't get me wrong.

[daniellei4510]

Errors such as artifacts, exposure issues, excessive grain, etc., are all things photographers (or AI designers) need to train themselves to become aware of and fix. If one needs AI to point out the obvious, that individual might want to try a different art form or craft.

[alper ömer312523869uwu]

I think that's a bit of a harsh viewpoint.

[daniellei4510]

Then let me soften it a bit. If one wants to be a photographer or an AI designer for fun or as a hobby, have at it. But for stock, one needs to learn to recognize the issues. It won't necessarily happen overnight, but it needs to happen sooner or later.

[alper ömer312523869uwu]

People improve themselves over time. Be tolerant of new contributors. There are thousands of contributors on this platform. Not everyone is at the same level. It would be an approach like trying to start from the highest level. You expect mastery from everyone right away.

[daniellei4510 · Accepted solution]

I'm probably one of the more tolerant contributors on this forum. 🙂 I am well aware that it takes time to learn. I amassed over 300 rejections during my first two or three months as a contributor. 200 of those rejections have since been re-edited and accepted, and my acceptance rate now stands at 98%. And I owe that, among other things, to this forum.

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

Adobe's Buyers, therefore Adobe, expect that Contributors display mastery of their craft. There is no accommodation in this business for beginners, because there is no market in Stock for substandard images. I wouldn't go back to the archives of my earliest days with my first DSLR and expect to be able to submit those images to Adobe Stock because I know for a fact that they wouldn't meet the quality criteria. 

[alper ömer312523869uwu]

The topic shifted in another direction again.

[Abambo]

The topic shifted in another direction again.

By @alper ömer312523869uwu

If you need to learn your craft, book a course. Adobe could expect any contributor to be at a professional level.

[Abambo]

You expect mastery from everyone right away.

By @alper ömer312523869uwu

This is a serious business. If you ask a plumber to make the water supply in your house, you won't be tolerant neither, if they tell you that they are beginners and therefore you will get a less then perfect work done.

[Abambo]

For example, Kodak had produced compact discs years ago that were designed solely for storing images.

By @alper ömer312523869uwu

Talking about digital images, KODAK is probably the worst company to talk about, as they basically invented the digital camera, but feared it would eat into their film business. 

[alper ömer312523869uwu]

I didn't mention the success of the Kodak company, but I wanted to compare the features of the compact disc it produced with AI.

[daniellei4510]

Speaking of digital cameras, when Canon was one of our sponsors for the online photography site I worked for,  they loaned me their first camera with a digital back so that I could make a 3D model of it. The resolution was 640x480, and they insured it for $10,000 when they mailed it to me. A year later, I asked if they wanted back. Their reply: "It's fine...just keep it. Or burn it."