Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The first image has logos and nonsense text. Whether or not the logos are actually trademarked is probably irrelevant, since the reviewer is not going to take the time to verify that.
You do not own the copyright to the second image, unless you're an astronaut who has flown in the space station...
The apple image has edge cutout issues.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I see some white cutout errors arround the edge of the apples leaf.
Where did you get the earth photo? Is it your property?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
As Ralph says the apple and Earth are not sharp at the edges. The drill is great - but you have to remove the product name - but even so it can be rejected for trade mark violation, it's not generic enough.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
As Ralph says the apple and Earth are not sharp at the edges. The drill is great - but you have to remove the product name - but even so it can be rejected for trade mark violation, it's not generic enough.
By @oleschwander
You've never seen a drill?
The drill is completely useless.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The first image has logos and nonsense text. Whether or not the logos are actually trademarked is probably irrelevant, since the reviewer is not going to take the time to verify that.
You do not own the copyright to the second image, unless you're an astronaut who has flown in the space station...
The apple image has edge cutout issues.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If it's a NASA image it should be ok for commercial use when you in the caption says e.g.: 'Elements of this image furnished by NASA'.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Adobe does not accept public domain images.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If it's a NASA image it should be ok for commercial use when you in the caption says e.g.: 'Elements of this image furnished by NASA'.
By @oleschwander
Sure, NASA images allow use for commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the image to NASA. Adobe stock, however, asks in their terms that you need to control all rights to the image, which is not the case with any NASA image. That is a blocking reason.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, OK Jill and Abambo - that's why I wrote 'should be'. But as is often the case, Adobe is riding two horses, because there are lots of pictures labeled 'Furnished by NASA'. There's a lack of coordination between the teams. But thanks for the clarification, maybe it's best to avoid NASA images at Adobe.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
(...), because there are lots of pictures labeled 'Furnished by NASA'. There's a lack of coordination between the teams.
By @oleschwander
There are a couple of former contributors that got suspended for using public domain files. I have no idea if they simply used public domain pictures from somewhere, or if they were using NASA images.
Also this: NASA requires that you credit NASA when using their pictures. When I use their pictures, I go to their site and download the asset from there. And I credit them, even in a commercial. 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
"NASA requires that you credit NASA when using their pictures."
True, and a Stock Buyer isn't going to waste a credit licensing a NASA image when they can get it for free from the NASA website.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Here's your competition:
https://stock.adobe.com/search?k="single+apple" 5K results
https://stock.adobe.com/search?k="earth" 13.5 MILLION results
https://stock.adobe.com/search?k="power+drill" 13K results
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Great! All the “power drills” generated by AI are crooked:
And PowerDrill is a trademark! Well, apple is one too.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now