Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

Image quality

New Here ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025

Hello everyone! I decided to try a new genre for myself - png isolates. But the percentage of passing moderation in terms of quality seemed not very high. Please tell me what could be wrong with these pictures?Lucid_Realism_Fresh_red_apple_with_leaf_professional_product_p_0_353ec851-fa9c-4ae2-a111-e5b375510583.pngLucid_Realism_Globe_model_of_Earth_professional_product_photog_0_55dde095-bddc-4d2d-981c-1e9e63575c6b.png

TOPICS
Contributor critique
354
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025

The first image has logos and nonsense text. Whether or not the logos are actually trademarked is probably irrelevant, since the reviewer is not going to take the time to verify that.

You do not own the copyright to the second image, unless you're an astronaut who has flown in the space station...

The apple image has edge cutout issues.

IMG_2396.jpegIMG_2395.jpeg

Translate
Community Expert ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025

I see some white cutout errors arround the edge of the apples leaf.
Where did you get the earth photo? Is it your property?

========================================
Photography is more than just pressing a button!
========================================
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025

As Ralph says the apple and Earth are not sharp at the edges. The drill is great - but you have to remove the product name - but even so it can be rejected for trade mark violation, it's not generic enough.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025
quote

As Ralph says the apple and Earth are not sharp at the edges. The drill is great - but you have to remove the product name - but even so it can be rejected for trade mark violation, it's not generic enough.


By @oleschwander

You've never seen a drill? 

Abambo_0-1749498636651.png

The drill is completely useless.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025

The first image has logos and nonsense text. Whether or not the logos are actually trademarked is probably irrelevant, since the reviewer is not going to take the time to verify that.

You do not own the copyright to the second image, unless you're an astronaut who has flown in the space station...

The apple image has edge cutout issues.

IMG_2396.jpegIMG_2395.jpeg

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025

If it's a NASA image it should be ok for commercial use when you in the caption says e.g.: 'Elements of this image furnished by NASA'.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025

Adobe does not accept public domain images.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025
quote

If it's a NASA image it should be ok for commercial use when you in the caption says e.g.: 'Elements of this image furnished by NASA'.


By @oleschwander

Sure, NASA images allow use for commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the image to NASA. Adobe stock, however, asks in their terms that you need to control all rights to the image, which is not the case with any NASA image. That is a blocking reason.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Yes, OK Jill and Abambo - that's why I wrote 'should be'. But as is often the case, Adobe is riding two horses, because there are lots of pictures labeled 'Furnished by NASA'. There's a lack of coordination between the teams. But thanks for the clarification, maybe it's best to avoid NASA images at Adobe.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025
quote

(...), because there are lots of pictures labeled 'Furnished by NASA'. There's a lack of coordination between the teams. 

By @oleschwander

There are a couple of former contributors that got suspended for using public domain files. I have no idea if they simply used public domain pictures from somewhere, or if they were using NASA images. 

 

Also this: NASA requires that you credit NASA when using their pictures. When I use their pictures, I go to their site and download the asset from there. And I credit them, even in a commercial. 🙂

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

"NASA requires that you credit NASA when using their pictures."
True, and a Stock Buyer isn't going to waste a credit licensing a NASA image when they can get it for free from the NASA website.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 09, 2025 Jun 09, 2025

Here's your competition:

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k="single+apple"  5K results

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k="earth"  13.5 MILLION results

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k="power+drill" 13K results

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025
LATEST

Great! All the “power drills” generated by AI are crooked: 

Abambo_0-1749585688226.png

Abambo_1-1749585697076.png

Abambo_2-1749585709569.png

And PowerDrill is a trademark! Well, apple is one too.

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines