Skip to main content
Known Participant
January 21, 2024
Resuelto

Image rejected due to Intellectual Property

  • January 21, 2024
  • 4 respuestas
  • 1526 visualizaciones

I had several images rejected for intellectual property issues but there are no identifying logos or trademarks and the clothing and studio are very generic. Any ideas?

Este tema ha sido cerrado para respuestas.
Mejor respuesta de Abambo

The moderator seems to think differently, I too, as the big window with view to the garden is not genereic. The owner of the place can easily identify this and that is the criteria. The accepted picture shows much less of the location. 

4 respuestas

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 21, 2024

It's possible the reviewer hurriedly checked the wrong reason for rejection box.  It sometimes happens.

 

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Legend
January 21, 2024

I would think it is the blue harness. But in one end of the thread you write that you have had pictures from the series accepted, so I am not sure about that.

Known Participant
January 21, 2024

Hi Oleschwander, the blue material is just fabric from any fabric store, very generic and these have all the same elements https://stock.adobe.com/au/stock-photo/id/659290369 and were accepted.

Regards,

Brett

Legend
January 21, 2024

Ok - then it's settled.

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 21, 2024

You will need a property release from the owner of the location (in addition to the model release).

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Known Participant
January 21, 2024

I have other shots from the series that were accepted. The property is very generic so that usually meets the guidelines to not require a property release. Series: https://stock.adobe.com/au/stock-photo/id/659290369

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertRespuesta
Community Expert
January 22, 2024

The moderator seems to think differently, I too, as the big window with view to the garden is not genereic. The owner of the place can easily identify this and that is the criteria. The accepted picture shows much less of the location. 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
George_F
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 21, 2024

Again, it's possible this is a title/keyword issue.  I'm willing to bet the rejections are related somehow.  I think using a copyrighted term as a keyword could be either an IP rejection or a Non-Compliant rejection.

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer
Known Participant
January 21, 2024

Thanks but I used the same keywords for others in the series https://stock.adobe.com/au/stock-photo/id/659290369 and they are all non-branded terms.