Known Participant

Answered

Image rejected due to Intellectual Property

Forum|Forum|2 years ago
January 21, 2024
4 replies
1526 views

I had several images rejected for intellectual property issues but there are no identifying logos or trademarks and the clothing and studio are very generic. Any ideas?

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Abambo

The moderator seems to think differently, I too, as the big window with view to the garden is not genereic. The owner of the place can easily identify this and that is the criteria. The accepted picture shows much less of the location.

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

It's possible the reviewer hurriedly checked the wrong reason for rejection box. It sometimes happens.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

O

oleschwander

Legend

I would think it is the blue harness. But in one end of the thread you write that you have had pictures from the series accepted, so I am not sure about that.

S

Star_ImagingAuthor

Known Participant

Hi Oleschwander, the blue material is just fabric from any fabric store, very generic and these have all the same elements https://stock.adobe.com/au/stock-photo/id/659290369 and were accepted.

Regards,

Brett

O

oleschwander

Legend

Ok - then it's settled.

Abambo

Community Expert

You will need a property release from the owner of the location (in addition to the model release).

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

S

Star_ImagingAuthor

Known Participant

I have other shots from the series that were accepted. The property is very generic so that usually meets the guidelines to not require a property release. Series: https://stock.adobe.com/au/stock-photo/id/659290369

S

Star_ImagingAuthor

Known Participant

The moderator seems to think differently, I too, as the big window with view to the garden is not genereic. The owner of the place can easily identify this and that is the criteria. The accepted picture shows much less of the location.

Thanks, yes I guess it would match on an image search. I will lower the depth of field in future images or get property releases.

George_F

Community Expert

Again, it's possible this is a title/keyword issue. I'm willing to bet the rejections are related somehow. I think using a copyrighted term as a keyword could be either an IP rejection or a Non-Compliant rejection.

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer

S

Star_ImagingAuthor

Known Participant

Thanks but I used the same keywords for others in the series https://stock.adobe.com/au/stock-photo/id/659290369 and they are all non-branded terms.

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded