Participating Frequently

Answered

Image review times - Why does it take so long lately?

Forum|Forum|1 year ago
August 8, 2024
7 replies
6430 views

So far in 2024 the amount of time required for image submissions to Adobe Stock to be reviewed has grown exponentially. It used to be a few days, now it takes at least a month.

For context, I DO NOT upload AI generated images and I do not mark them as such. I have seen other posts stating that the AI content takes a long time to be reviewed because some people upload 500+ at once.

I upload somewhat sporadically and only around 3-10 images at a time. I tag all the images appropriately.

Does anyone have any ideas on what might be causing such a delay?

Correct answer Jill_C

We don't really know why review times have grown considerably in the last few months. It could be because Gen AI continues to be submitted at high rates; it could also be because Adobe has reduced headcount in the Moderation staff. It could also be because Adobe has decided to throttle the influx of new assets into the database. I've only had 5 photographs (I also don't submit AI) reviewed in the last 2 months, and some of them had waited for 2-3 months to be looked at. Nevertheless, I keep up a steady flow of new submissions, because I know they'll all get reviewed eventually.

N

N D H

Participating Frequently

I'm at 8 months now for some submissions. What other sites are you all using that are better?

Abambo

Community Expert

I'm at 8 months now for some submissions. What other sites are you all using that are better?

By @N D H

Moderation speed: any other site.

Number of sales: none.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

E

Eva36887359nzz2

Participating Frequently

Yeah, I agree with @Peste65,. I really liked my adobe stock contributor portfolio for vector (also cause I got a higher percentage of earnings.) But uploaded new stuff exclusively to competitor. They take around 2 days(!) rather than 3 months to approve. So not sure if "doing all they can" is really convincing.
For buying photos on stock, I really loved how neat the process was of easy ordering and directly importing the images to photoshop with one click. But also switched to competition for buying now to a avoid low quality ai pictures and copyright issues on professional projects. Stock has unfortunately consistently been declining in user friendliness and quality over the last year.

J

John315713866f38

Participating Frequently

I must say, after coming back from a trip in western USA and uploading both videos and photos I am stunned by how quickly its reviewed compared to earlier this year. Videos take 1 to 3 days (unless there is a lot of visual information from a city or so) and images between 2-5 days, most pass without any problem. Editorial images usually within 24 hours.

Abambo

Community Expert

(...) uploading both videos and photos I am stunned by how quickly its reviewed compared to earlier this year. Videos take 1 to 3 days (unless there is a lot of visual information from a city or so) and images between 2-5 days, most pass without any problem. Editorial images usually within 24 hours.

By @John315713866f38

You are getting a happy streak, I suppose.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

terrybrooks

Inspiring

Over 3 months for some now
Total waste of time and effort, my request for account deletion is going in now, income from it is pathetic compared to the time input, Hell, selling my ass on the streets would be less painfull.

terrybrooks

Inspiring

Done, no more messing around with this crap for me

Jill_C

Community Expert

You're responding to yourself ???

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

daniellei4510

Community Expert

" I have seen other posts stating that the AI content takes a long time to be reviewed because some people upload 500+ at once."

Adobe has set limitations on the number of assets (AI or otherwise) that can be submitted for review (51, 501, and 3001). I could be mistaken, but I doubt that someone with 501 assets awaiting review are having every one of them reviewed at once. There was a time, but I believe those days are over. I have 33 AI assets presently awaiting review, and I generally have about 7 assets reviewed each day. But not all 33 at once.

"I DO NOT upload AI generated images and I do not mark them as such."

I DO upload AI exclusively, and I have not experienced the issue so many others have been dealing with. But we have also had AI contributors post here that they have been dealing with long review times as well.

"Does anyone have any ideas on what might be causing such a delay?"

Nope. Nor do we know why some contributors have assets reviewed within a few days, while their other submissions sit and stew for weeks or even months. Me personally, my images of people are reviewed in the order submitted, while my food and animal assets are repeatedly ignored. Go figure.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

T

test2024

Participant

If I upload 10 to 20 images, will they be reviewed more quickly than if I upload 50 images at once?

Jill_C

Community Expert

I don't think so... I'm Adobe Stock Contributor since 2012 (when it was named "Fotolia") and I always done the same stuff: stock of 10-20 photo every send (usually about one or two send/month) and the review time was not more than 1 week! Now I have photos pending since late may 2024 (we're at the end of October!!!): more tha 5 months?!?! That's crazy!! Actually I'm stock contributor for other sites (as here in Adobe, I'm not exclusive for nobody): the longest review time thath I faced is not more 2-3 weeks! Adobe is the only one that have this "geological" time to review! And, for the love of truth, I've never used AI and I sell more in other sites...

I didn't say that the "slow and steady" approach improved review speed. I've been a contributor since 2016 and am experiencing the same issues. Some images take many months to review while newer assets are reviewed sooner. I also have some waiting since late May/early June. Nevertheless, submitting a steady trickle of images results in a steady trickle of reviews - eventually.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

terrybrooks

Inspiring

It's ridiculous, over 2 months so far for review of photographs, no AI, no copyright stuff, just my own landscape images
Waste of time submitting, think I'm going to pull all my images from stock agencies now

Jill_C

Community Expert

Why would you pull your existing images from stock agencies just because Adobe's reviews are running slowly lately? They will get approved eventually and will remain for sale forever.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

daniellei4510

Community Expert

I only submit AI and I have seen a considerable slow-down as well. But that also extends to sales and even the number of posts on this forum. Everything appears to have slowed down, at least for me. I blame summer. Moderators are taking vacations. Graphic designers are taking vacations. Recent heat waves. Tropical storm Debby. Just speculation, though. That's all we have to offer.

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.

Jill_C

Correct answer

Community Expert

We don't really know why review times have grown considerably in the last few months. It could be because Gen AI continues to be submitted at high rates; it could also be because Adobe has reduced headcount in the Moderation staff. It could also be because Adobe has decided to throttle the influx of new assets into the database. I've only had 5 photographs (I also don't submit AI) reviewed in the last 2 months, and some of them had waited for 2-3 months to be looked at. Nevertheless, I keep up a steady flow of new submissions, because I know they'll all get reviewed eventually.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

S

SpivR

Known Participant

I wonder what Adobe whats to achieve with their stock collection?

I realize they have never promised a specific review turnaround time, but 8 weeks going on infinity is simply sending the message they don't care and don't really want submissions.

I think if Adobe wants to be professional and keep building their stock service, they should commit to a review time and add the resources to achieve it.

If AI submissions are slamming them, then some strategy needs to be implemented to handle it. (I won't tell them what to do, that's for Adobe to figure out and since the whole stock review pipeline is opaque to us, we really don't have any info to make any kind of informed feedback/suggestion anyway.)

I hear a lot of chatter in general (not from Adobe), that AI is killing the stock business. If so, just tell us and we can move on.

Jill_C

Community Expert

Adobe has nearly 521 million assets in their database, and they're adding millions more every week. They don't need to review images any more rapidly than they already are to maintain this growth level. If they felt that the ROI justified hiring more Moderators they would do so. Reviewing assets quickly doesn't mean that they'll sell more.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded