Skip to main content
I
IvAnB
Participating Frequently
February 3, 2023
Question

Imagen rechazada.

  • February 3, 2023
  • 7 replies
  • 895 views

Buenos días. Me rechazan estás fotografías. Creo que el motivo puede ser por el movimiento de las hélices. Que puedo hacer?

This topic has been closed for replies.

7 replies

jacquelingphoto2017
Community Expert
jacquelingphoto2017Community Expert
Community Expert
February 6, 2023

Hi @IvAnB ,

Your subject needs to be larger. You have too much negative space. To freeze the motion you need faster shutter speed and a burst of shots. Once or a few will come out without motion blur.

I suggest you do a course in photography. Ben Lung at LinkedIn Learn is a very good tutor. Two samples of his lectures are on this link. 

Please note: One of the videos might auto-start when you open the link.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

Best wishes

Jacquelin

    Ricky336
    Community Expert
    Ricky336Community Expert
    Community Expert
    February 5, 2023

    Hola,

    I think that generally speaking, your image of the drone is too small in the frame. Currently, it is hard to determine what it actually is! Your composition would play a part here as well. It could be positioned better in the frame of the camera.

    Secondly, I also wonder about its commercial use. Who would use this? There are a lot of examples in stock on drone photos:

    Drone Images – Browse 3,668,093 Stock Photos, Vectors, and Video | Adobe Stock

      Abambo
      Community Expert
      AbamboCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      February 4, 2023

      Artefacts like this let me think that you applied a lot of sharpening:

      The screenshot here should be blurred, like natural out of focus blur.

       

      ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
        I
        IvAnBAuthor
        Participating Frequently
        February 4, 2023

        Gracias, no sabía a qué te referías con "artefactos". Sin duda, esto me ayudará a mejorar.

        Abambo
        Community Expert
        AbamboCommunity Expert
        Community Expert
        February 4, 2023

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artifact

         

        Maybe this helps.

        ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
          Abambo
          Community Expert
          AbamboCommunity Expert
          Community Expert
          February 4, 2023

          Definitly: it's not the propellers. It's normal to have propellers moving, so that part should be OK. What did Adobe say with the rejection?

          ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
          I
          IvAnBAuthor
          Participating Frequently
          February 4, 2023

          Problemas de calidad 

            Abambo
            Community Expert
            AbamboCommunity Expert
            Community Expert
            February 4, 2023

            You should remember that we require the refusal reason that Adobe gave you. That is of a great help and takes away much of the guesswork. We will give anyhow all reasons we see, including the commercial value.

             

            The commercial value is kind of appreciation, and one of the pictures, I have submitted and where I suspected low commercial value, sells fine. But still, I agree with @Nancy OShea that this asset here has little commercial value and I agree with @Jill_C that more of your subject should be in the frame to make this an interesting picture.

            ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
              Nancy OShea
              Community Expert
              Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
              Community Expert
              February 3, 2023

              Of what commercial value is this to anyone? 

              Would you buy it? 

              What would you use it for?


              Adobe Stock customers expect images of highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects.  Emphasis on commercial use.


              Hope that helps.

               

              Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
              Jill_C
              Community Expert
              Jill_CCommunity Expert
              Community Expert
              February 3, 2023

              It's a tiny, blurry unidentifiable object. You would have needed to fill the frame with the object and use a much faster shutter speed to create an acceptable image.

              Jill C., Forum Volunteer
                Abambo
                Community Expert
                AbamboCommunity Expert
                Community Expert
                February 4, 2023

                Fill the frame, yes. Faster shutter speed: I don't think so. I suspect it's more the overall quality: artefact in the blurred part, small object, pole in the upper part etc. It simply does not look right, interesting and well framed. Looking on my iPad at higher magnification, I see multiple artefacts.

                ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
                T
                Test Screen Name
                Legend
                February 3, 2023

                You can't make money from stock pictures of someone else's property - the Drone maker owns the rights. Also the composition is not great - the drone is far too small. You didn't tell us the reason for rejection - IP, quality - both of these apply.

                  I
                  IvAnBAuthor
                  Participating Frequently
                  February 3, 2023

                  El motivo es por calidad. Los drones son de construcción privada.

                  Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
                  Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices