Skip to main content
Participant
January 31, 2023
Answered

Images got rejected - quality issues

  • January 31, 2023
  • 4 replies
  • 498 views

Can you please help me why the following images got rejected and what i need to do to prevent this from happening again using AI generative images?

Thanks in advance.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Nancy OShea

Besides the clipping issues mentioned by @Jill_C 

  • Octopus eyes are bizarre.  They normally have small slits for eyes because they are very sensitive to light.
  • Cheetah's spots are blurry.
  • Flamingos have no feet.  If standing in something, there's no context for it here.

AI synthesis is imperfect with details.  Inspect AI art carefully and fix what you can.

 

4 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 4, 2023

This is wrong:

 

 

 


Compare this to real flamingos:

 

 

(Aliasing)

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Nancy OSheaCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 1, 2023

Besides the clipping issues mentioned by @Jill_C 

  • Octopus eyes are bizarre.  They normally have small slits for eyes because they are very sensitive to light.
  • Cheetah's spots are blurry.
  • Flamingos have no feet.  If standing in something, there's no context for it here.

AI synthesis is imperfect with details.  Inspect AI art carefully and fix what you can.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 1, 2023

In each of the animal images, composition is an issue because parts of the animal are cropped off. 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Participant
January 31, 2023

[DUPLICATE POST MERGED WITH ORIGINAL TOPIC BY MODERATOR.]

 

Can you help me why these images got rejected using generativ AI? Thanks in advance 🙂

   

George_F
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 31, 2023

In general if you view in to 100% view in Lightroom/Photoshop you'll see the details are very soft and blurry with these.

The cheetah may have too shallow of a depth of field to be accepted, but I can't tell with the details being so soft.  

The goat image had several random spots/artefacts that are common with AI photos that are on one hand creative, but on another hand very likely considered a technical imperfection by Adobe.  The goat photo also had some aliasing/jagged edges when zoomed in, which is common with upscaling.

I hope that helps!

George F, Photographer & Forum Volunteer