Skip to main content
O
Olivi
Participating Frequently
November 17, 2023
Answered

Lots of rejected AI images

  • November 17, 2023
  • 4 replies
  • 10359 views

Hello everyone, colleagues.
I encountered a problem with many AI rejecting images and I don’t understand why, because sometimes images with worse quality are accepted, and images with better quality are rejected. Sometimes images are of the same quality, half are rejected, half are accepted.
I generate in Midjouney, increase in Topaz Gigapixel without applying the enhancement settings.
What do you think is wrong?
Here are some images for example:

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer Jill_C

    In addition to the valid comments from @RALPH_L  and @daniellei4510 , I also see the following:

    zagr 8 - 354.jpg - the bright spot in the woman's hair looks like a mistake. The bokeh spots of light in the background don't make sense because there is no source.

    zagr 8 - 355.jpg - definitely should not have been accepted. The girl's teeth, ear and fingers are poorly formed. If a Buyer licenses this and then takes a closer look, they'll ask for a refund.

    zagr7 - 186.jpg - spot of light in her shoulder, the hand is oddly shaped and green.

    zagr7 - 190.jpg - pupils aren't round; inner corners of eyes very unrealistic.

     

    As you've learned, moderation, which is done by humans, can be inconsistent. I think they're under pressure to maintain a high volume of reviews, sometimes resulting in flawed images that are accepted. 

     

     

     

     

    4 replies

    Olmyntay
    Olmyntay
    Known Participant
    November 19, 2023

    Some kind of terror of AI content just started, I encountered the same thing.
    And yes, the problem is that it is impossible to understand the essence of the problem!
    I think this is simple envy and downgrading of ratings, which ensures a decrease in sales. Since a lot of generative content began to reach the top, it is clear that photographers and artists who are also moderators suffer because of this.
    I realize this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but what are the options?
    All these comments about pointing out quality problems are completely unhelpful! Thus, problems can be found in anything! Three fingers on the hand are still clear, but otherwise there is no logic, and still no one answers the main question.

      Abambo
      Community Expert
      AbamboCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      November 20, 2023
      quote

      Since a lot of generative content began to reach the top, it is clear that photographers and artists who are also moderators suffer because of this.


      By @Olmyntay

      Artists and photographers are not moderators of Adobe stock. None here is a stock moderator.

      quote

      All these comments about pointing out quality problems are completely unhelpful! Thus, problems can be found in anything! Three fingers on the hand are still clear, but otherwise there is no logic, and still no one answers the main question.


      By @Olmyntay

      The “main question” is: What do you think is wrong?

      There is a lot of good advice in this stream that shows what, we think, is wrong. If you think that quality is not an issue for the buyer, then you are not a professional stock user, who has customers complaining about bad work. All this moderation is not done to refuse your work, or to make you a better contributor, but to protect the buyer from bad assets. As the moderation is done by humans, and humans do err, there are some assets that get accepted, but should have got refused. That is not a reason for accepting other bad assets.

      quote

      I think this is simple envy and downgrading of ratings, which ensures a decrease in sales.


      By @Olmyntay

      This is nonsense. Adobe (not your competitors) moderates the assets. They aim to have high-quality assets, to increase sales. They are contributor blind. Furthermore, they are completely uninterested in which assets sell, they just promote what currently sells. But they are interested in having more customers buying, and fewer customers complaining. And they need security concerning releases and use of IP.

      ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
        Olmyntay
        Olmyntay
        Known Participant
        November 23, 2023
        quoteOtherwise, why was it accepted if it has errors?

        By @Olmyntay

        In a perfect world, there are no errors. But we do not live in a perfect world. So, some of the accepted assets are erronous and have been accepted by error. If those errors get detected, there will be corrective measures. That seems to be evident. 


        In this case, if the moderators correct these errors, they will have to remove all generative content! Or 99% of this content %)))) 


        Jill_C
        Community Expert
        Jill_CCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
        Community Expert
        November 17, 2023

        In addition to the valid comments from @RALPH_L  and @daniellei4510 , I also see the following:

        zagr 8 - 354.jpg - the bright spot in the woman's hair looks like a mistake. The bokeh spots of light in the background don't make sense because there is no source.

        zagr 8 - 355.jpg - definitely should not have been accepted. The girl's teeth, ear and fingers are poorly formed. If a Buyer licenses this and then takes a closer look, they'll ask for a refund.

        zagr7 - 186.jpg - spot of light in her shoulder, the hand is oddly shaped and green.

        zagr7 - 190.jpg - pupils aren't round; inner corners of eyes very unrealistic.

         

        As you've learned, moderation, which is done by humans, can be inconsistent. I think they're under pressure to maintain a high volume of reviews, sometimes resulting in flawed images that are accepted. 

         

         

         

         

        Jill C., Forum Volunteer
          O
          OliviAuthor
          Participating Frequently
          November 17, 2023

          Thank you very much for your opinion, I will try to improve the quality through retouching

            daniellei4510
            Community Expert
            daniellei4510Community Expert
            Community Expert
            November 17, 2023

            zagr7 - 186
            There's something about the hand that I can't quite put my finger on (no pun intended). Is the middle finger abnormally long? The decorative hat/mask: jewel-studded costumes raise problems when it comes to AI. All of the jewels are misshapen or have random facets, while some seem a cross between a jewel and decorative cloth.

            zagr 8 - 355
            Although accepted, it should have been rejected. Look at the teeth at 200%. The eyes lack detail and there are fly-away hairs that could be removed.

            zagr - 354
            Same deal with the teeth and eyes. The woman's earring adds nothing and could have been removed. The decoration on the girl's head lacks distinct ball shapes and in spots look like a mass of jelly.|

            zagr7 - 190
            This should have been rejected as well. This is one of those Midjourney hybrids that are part photorealistic and part illustration. The pupils and lips, for example, are far from photorealistic.

            Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
              O
              OliviAuthor
              Participating Frequently
              November 17, 2023

              Thank you very much for your opinion, I will try to improve the quality

              Abambo
              Community Expert
              AbamboCommunity Expert
              Community Expert
              November 19, 2023

              355 needs to be deleted, even though it got an initial approval. If you have many of such assets and Adobe reviews your account, your account could be suspended.

               

              You will need to be much more critical of your own pictures. Hoping that the moderator does not see the errors is not a good strategy. That could backfire.

               

              ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
                RALPH_L
                Community Expert
                RALPH_LCommunity Expert
                Community Expert
                November 17, 2023

                Spend less time creating images and more time editing them.

                Just a quick glance at number 354 and I see:

                --the image is too soft and not in focus.

                --the berries in the girls hair are melted together.

                --the lady has an orange spot in her hair.

                --her left eye (the bag underneath) does not match the right eye.

                -- her ear ring is formed wrong.

                --her ring is formed wrong.

                --the finger nail on her pointing finger is wrong.

                --the bridge of her glasses is formed wrong.

                Should I keep looking?

                Seriously, don't waste your time sending bad images. AI is a new frontier, but it does not take away the need to review and edit.

                  O
                  OliviAuthor
                  Participating Frequently
                  November 17, 2023

                  Thank you very much for your opinion, I will try to improve the quality 

                  M
                  MindGems
                  Known Participant
                  November 20, 2023

                  Basically if anything is Off in the image, it there are tell tail signs of Ai it wont be accepted. Plus you do yourself a diservice submitting bad content, I'm quite sure the more refusals the lower your standing and we all suffer with large volumes of crap waiting for reviews.

                  Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
                  Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices