My all photos are not accepting by Adobe stock

[Rai alex]

When i uplaod photos since 28 july adobe stock not accepting it and declined all my photo to say that its some quality issues but my all AI based photos are upto 700KBs but still declined

 

 plz check these images and assist me!

 

[RALPH_L]

You must upload a rejected image for us to review.

[Rai alex]

[Gabinetus]

Adobe filtering is a joke.  All my photos were mine.  As far as so called errors due to colors focus etc? Subject to interpretation.  You as in adobe will not accept their own lightroom product-the photos.  Hypocrites. 

I will post this place else.  

[daniellei4510]

Well that's a bunch of nonsense from out of the blue. On a thread first started in August of 23 no less.

[Jill_C]

You are not addressing Adobe directly here in this forum.
I think you meant Adobe moderation, not adobe "filtering". I have seen hundreds of rejected images here, and it is very rare to see one that was wrongly rejected. It's usually easy to find the quality issues. Some quality issues aren't a matter of interpretation - soft focus is easy to detec, as is noise, artifacts, chromatic aberration, leaning horizons, overexposure, underexposure, and many other issues. Adobe doesn't have to accept images just because they were edited in Lightroom. Lightroom can't fix every quality issue. If you would like to upload a couple of the rejected images here, you will receive useful feedback from community members as to the issues and whether they're repairable.

[Abambo]

Using Adobe tools does not give you automatic admission to Adobe stock! The pictures need to meet very well defined standard quality requirements. 

but you are free to submit at any stock site. Good luck.

[Jill_C]

Quality issues encompass a lot more than just file size. We cannot judge the quality by the tiny thumbnails above, so please upload 2 or 3 of the rejected images here and the community members will comment on them.

[Rai alex]

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

You see all kinds of artefacts and errors in these assets. You should examine them at 100% before submission.

The screenshots show only a part of the errors in these images. You need to fix all errors before submission. That makes the assets pretty difficult to get through.

[Rai alex]

Omg I can't even think about it 

So i think i need to change Generative AI tools?

Or can you suggest me any AI where i can fix these images! 

[Jill_C]

You can try using different Generative AI tools, or try generating the same or similar images with different prompts. But it's most important to carefully inspect every AI assets for these kinds of errors which are very easy to spot when you zoom in review them carefully. Some errors can be fixed in Photoshop, but probably not these - they're just too numerous. If you expect to be successful at selling AI images, you WILL need to learn how to make corrections to your images in Photoshop. 

[Rai alex]

So, i should go for very simple and Clean photos which have not any errors and i will learn about it but there are not too many videos on YouTube where i will learn about it 

If you have any kind of video plz Send me it link or full video to my Gmail as im in some trouble but i got some good info here and i will try to do best thing while submitting any asset

One more 

Is there any problem of new check box where this written (people and property are fictional) bcz i never fill it 

I just fill that this image is created by ai and secondly (No) check and then give the title and Tags 

[Jill_C]

Read ALL of the Adobe Stock help pages relating to Generative AI. Seems like you've skipped that part of the process of becoming a stock Contributor. 

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html

Take time to learn all the tools before you start uploading. There are many, many Midjourney tutorials on YouTube. Regarding what images are needed, check yours against others that are already in the Adobe Stock database which now has nearly 13 images. Some categories are already saturated. Concentrate on quality. 

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

I just feel that this image is created by AI and secondly (No) check and then give the title and Tags 

By @Rai alex

===========

Wrong.  AI is very challenging work.

In my experience with Midjourney, I often have to generate 100 or more high quality diffusions before I get 3-5 decent images to work with.  This can get costly.

Even with 3-5 decent images in hand, I often spend hours making corrections in Photoshop before they're suitable for submission to Stock.  And that's still no guarantee of acceptance.

Successful AI contributors use special AI image enhancing tools and services which can add additional costs to production.  But that's what's required if you want to succeed as an AI contributor.

This isn't for everyone.  You'll need an ample budget, skills, much patience and artistic talent to get good results with AI.  Many people give up because AI is more time consuming than they thought it would be.

Good luck.

[Abambo]

I just feel that this image is created by AI and secondly (No) check and then give the title and Tags 

By @Rai alex

==========

This isn't for everyone.  You'll need an ample budget, skills, much patience and artistic talent to get good results with AI.  Many people give up because AI is more time consuming than they thought it would be.

By @Nancy OShea

Many think that AI is push button solution for people with no artictic skills. But in addition they do not understand the quality requirements for submitting to stock. What may be adequate for a social media posting, at low resolution, isn't when you submit with stock. 

As soon as it becomes a push button solution, the need for stock disappears.

[Abambo]

I do not use AI extensively, but the quality of your AI creations need to match the quality of a photography. From my experience here, AI generates images that need to be fixed. May be @daniellei4510 may help you with tipps here.

[Rai alex]

I'm using Blue willow AI to create Images but im not satisfied with it at all as i subscribe it's monthly premium but Didn't get Good enough results as my friend suggest this tool to me... 

Hy sir daniel can you help me as i just want to know about it i got some good information from here but still need 

I have some questions

Is there any problem comes from check boxes while submitting a image 

2. Is there any resolution of image problem or Quality

And 3rd one ia that plz suggest me some Good type of images which are Generate Perfectly and trending on adobe stock contributor Thank you! 

[daniellei4510]

To be honest, I think landscapes or seascapes or anything along those lines are probably the most difficult to work with when it comes to AI. Especially when you introduce a primary subject (such as your boats) to be used in the foreground of such images. Regardless of subjet matter, however, you will normally have to resign yourself to editing AI images. And by normally I mean...always.

Note, for example, that @Abambo's critiques all pertain to the boats themselves. If you were to use content aware fill and cloning tools to remove them, rather than spend hours editing them, would these images fare better if the seascapes themselves were the main subject? Possibly, I don't know. But you would be providing a potential buyer the option of inserting their own subject matter if they so desired or just use them as seascapes alone.

Anyway, again...you've chosen one of the most difficult subjects to master when it comes to AI. Trying honing your skills using other subjects for awhile (wallpapers, graphic assets, food, animals, etc.) that should provide you with results that are at least easier to edit until you feel comfortable editing more difficult subjects.

[Abambo]

Note, for example, that @Abambo's critiques all pertain to the boats themselves. If you were to use content aware fill and cloning tools to remove them, rather than spend hours editing them, would these images fare better if the seascapes themselves were the main subject?

I only looked at the boats. I'm sure to find also errors unrelated to the boat. If you do not have the boats, the focus needs to be somewhere else. 

To be honest, I think landscapes or seascapes or anything along those lines are probably the most difficult to work with when it comes to AI.
(…)
Trying honing your skills using other subjects for awhile (wallpapers, graphic assets, food, animals, etc.) that should provide you with results that are at least easier to edit until you feel comfortable editing more difficult subjects.

By @daniellei4510

Great suggestion. 

[Rai alex]

Hmmm, I Understood i was just thinking that you just need to give command to AI and it will create image for you and you just submit it to adobe but there is lot of work to with images Yeah i will spend some time to study how to correct images and made it capable for adobe stock and now im going to work on just 2 subjects wallpapers and nature

Than you very much for your precious time! 

[olivier31614861xbec]

The same for me!

The reason? "Quality issue" : as it is said, could be exposure or blur, or too many filters or artifacts or noise.. ( and not whatever ?)

It casts far and wide.. I wonder how can I have yet more than 2000 pictures in Stock!

Likely that they have moved their moderator team in a low cost country, with quick and dirty support payed per click..

The reasons given below about the boat are insane! The picture is splendid. The details tagged as "defects" are real! 

That is real word, men! Yes,  there is an antenna on a boat, and many ropes and strings!! who cares? who will zoom at 500% and reject a so nice shoot for such reasons??

Adobe is killing the Stock business model which strongly relies on the contributors to contribute!

[Blitzlichtgewitter]

Half of my uploaded pictures are accepted, I do Photoshop , vector, size and color corrections before uploading them, though.

[Abambo]

The same for me!

The reason? "Quality issue" : as it is said, could be exposure or blur, or too many filters or artifacts or noise.. ( and not whatever ?)

By @olivier31614861xbec

Open a new thread and post an image or two, and we will point you to the errors.

Likely that they have moved their moderator team in a low cost country, with quick and dirty support payed per click..

By @olivier31614861xbec

The moderators are doing (mostly) a good job. In numerous instances, they are, however, not stringent enough.

The reasons given below about the boat are insane! The picture is splendid. The details tagged as "defects" are real! 

That is real word, men! Yes,  there is an antenna on a boat, and many ropes and strings!! who cares? who will zoom at 500% and reject a so nice shoot for such reasons??

By @olivier31614861xbec

100% is enough. Yes, there are many ropes, many antennas, and many other things. And in the real world, all those ropes get interrupted like that and still hold the tension.

And why do you have fishes on the cabin roof?

And I'm not convinced, how this geometry of the cabin works:

In addition, I can see countless artefacts and washed-out colours in this picture. The low-cost moderator had an easy job with refusing this one, as they refuse on the first error they see.

Adobe is killing the Stock business model which strongly relies on the contributors to contribute!

By @olivier31614861xbec

The stock business relies before most on the clients who get angry when they get faulty assets. Moderation is done to protect the buyer, not to anger the contributor.

[Jill_C]

The images you're referring to are NOT real world; they're AI generated. Even if the images were captured with a real camera in the real world, they would still have been rejected for the very obvious flaws. 

Thr Moderation team is skilled at what they do, and we rarely see a rejected image here which does not have obvious, rejectable flaws.