Skip to main content
Rylen
Participant
April 6, 2022
Answered

new to contributor question

  • April 6, 2022
  • 4 replies
  • 588 views

Hi, I make stuff like this sometimes, I am wondering how content quality guidlines can somehow reject geometric abstraction as a genre? I understand a platform probably wants to control the overall represtation of themselves and its associations, feel free to let me know!

 

 

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo
quote
(...), so I expect some minor issues with quality as I attempt to conform my work to standards (...)
By @Rylen

Perfection is just enough.

4 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 6, 2022

This is a commercial business.  Ask yourself who will buy this and what will they use it for?  If the answer to either question is "I don't know," it's probably not right for Adobe Stock.

 

I can make my own fractals and other abstract designs in Photoshop with one hand tied behind my back -- both manually and with scripts. There is no shortage of abstracts in Stock's inventory.  But the bigger question is does it sell?  No. 

 

Stock customers come here searching for high quality images of real places, people and things that they can use in commercial projects like videos, magazines, billboards, merchandise and million dollar ad campaigns.  

 

If you want to be successful at Stock, put your time into more profitable pursuits.  Read these links:

 

Better luck next time.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
reedesign1912
Inspiring
April 6, 2022

Hi @Rylen , I also see a couple of dead pixels in the image and chromatic aberration in the top left white line.

 

I hope this helps.

Rob R, Photographer
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 6, 2022

What was the rejection reason? I guess technical issues?

 

I've seen hard edges, where there should be soft ones:

This is not a natural cut-off.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Rylen
RylenAuthor
Participant
April 6, 2022

hmm, I am trying to create physical structures and implications with light, I will try making more natural hard edges vs soft edges (:

I've really wanted to bridge my interest in geometric abstraction with photography in a way that utilizes the present moment in the surrounding area when the photo is taken, so I expect some minor issues with quality as I attempt to conform my work to standards

 heres what I do with ink, thanks for the feedback!

 

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
April 6, 2022
quote
(...), so I expect some minor issues with quality as I attempt to conform my work to standards (...)
By @Rylen

Perfection is just enough.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 6, 2022

Was it rejected for "technical reasons"?

 

Rylen
RylenAuthor
Participant
April 6, 2022

yes

Its def possible because its super dark, depending on what happens with the next 19 I can try uploading non edited ones next