For whatever is is worth, these images were submitted with the same title and similar keywords to Getty, and were accepted readily. Are there quibbles with the concept? Adobe initially rejected them all as non-compliant, and while I understand that the moderators have little extra time for explanation, I can find no obvious reason these were rejected, so any attempt to bring them into compliance will be a frustrating shot in the dark. At this point it doesn't seem like time well spent to pursue.
None-compliant means something to be corrected/addressed except one or more of similar images were rejected for "Similar". When Adobe does not want an image "commercial appeal" or "similar" rejection is used.
Thank you for responding. I did submit a model release, but I didn’t see any communication regarding an issue with it. Where might I find that communication if it was sent to me? -- —————————— David Gillis Design | david@davidgillisdesign.com | 207.841.5016
For the rejection, you should have gotten an e-mail notice. If you did not see the e-mail notice in your inbox, check your spam folder for it. To get details of the e-mail notice you need to go to your contributor page
On the black menu bar, click on "Uploaded file"
On the new page, below the top black menu bar click on "Rejected".
There you will see thumbnails of all your rejected files. Each one you click on will show you the details on the right side of the page.
To find the images that you should resubmit with a release, click on "Reminder" on the menu below the black menu bar. (Beside "Reminder" you will see the number of assets that are there requiring releases.
In any case I believe you got a none compliant rejection because you resubmitted the affected files without providing whatever it was that the moderator rejected it for the first time around, not necessarily model release. Therefore you need to look for what it was rejected for the first time and correct that before resubmitting.